Posts Tagged ‘Orad’

Orad Warns of Lower Revenue, Net Loss in Q4 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Feb 27 2013

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad disclosed that it expects its Q4 2012 revenue to be in the range of between approximately $ 6.9m and $7.1m, 18% to 21% lower than the third quarter of 2012.

As a result of the lower revenue, the company says it now expects to report a net loss in the range of $600,000 to $800,000 for the fourth quarter of 2012.

The company said its Q4 2012 revenue decline was “largely due to the economic weakening of Orad’s target markets, particularly Europe. The uncertainties in the economic environment have led to lengthening of sales cycles and to delay of some customers’ investment decisions.”

Orad says that it now expects to report a net profit in the range of $1m to $1.2m for the full year 2012, 27% to 34% lower than last year.

This announcement appears to be a continuation of the decline in European revenue that Orad began to experience in the third quarter of 2012.  The company’s revenue in the third quarter of 2012 was $8.8m, down 2.7% versus the same period a year ago, and down 14% versus the previous quarter. At that time, company CEO Avi Sharir said the company’s Q3 results were impacted by a slowdown in its markets, especially in Europe.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Ad-hoc-Disclosure According to § 15 WpHG

European Slowdown Results in Lower Revenue and Profit for Orad in Q3 2012

Orad Top Line Grows 21% in 2011, Profit up 24%

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

European Slowdown Results in Lower Revenue and Profit for Orad in Q3 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Nov 19 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for the third quarter of 2012 was $8.8m, down 2.7% versus the same period a year ago, and down 14% versus the previous quarter.

Company CEO Avi Sharir said the company’s Q3 results were impacted by a slowdown in its markets, especially in Europe.

Net profit for the quarter was $122,000, down 85% versus last year, and down 81% versus last quarter.

Gross margins for the quarter were 67% versus 71% last year, and 69% last quarter.

Operating income for the third quarter was $11,000, down from $1.036m last year, and $919,000 last quarter.

Operating expenses for the quarter were $5.87m, up 9% versus last year.

R&D expense for the quarter was $1.4m, or 16% of total revenue, up 7% versus the same period a year ago, and flat versus the previous quarter.

Sales & marketing expenses were $3.57m, or 41% of total revenue in the quarter, up 17% versus the third quarter of 2011, and down 6% versus the previous quarter.

G&A expenses in the quarter were $897,000, or 10% of total revenue, down 12% from last year, and flat with the previous quarter.

The company ended the quarter with 261 employees, up from 251 last quarter; and $8.3m in cash, down from $13.1m last year, and $9.6m last quarter.

 

Year-to-date Revenue up 8.5 Percent

For the first nine months of 2012, Orad’s revenue was $27.9m, up 8.5% versus the first nine months of 2011. The company attributed the YTD revenue increase to new products and expansion into new geographic territories.

Net Profit for the first nine months of 2012 was $1.6m, down 30% versus the same period a year ago.

Gross Margins for the first nine months of 2012 were 68%, down from 70% for the same period a year ago.

Operating income for first nine months of 2012 was $1.621m, down 29% versus last year.

R&D expenses for the first nine months of 2012 was $4.22m, or 15% of total revenue, up 12% versus the same period a year ago.  Sales & marketing expenses for first nine months of 2012 were $10.487m, or 38% of total revenue, up 14% versus the same period last year. Year-to-date G&A expenses were $2.795m, or 10% of total revenue, essentially flat with last year.

 

Sharir said that the company’s revenue in the first nine months of 2012 grew by 8% versus the same period in 2011, but that revenue in the third quarter of 2012 was impacted by a slowdown in its main markets, especially in Europe.  This is a contrast to last quarter when the company said that weak macroeconomic environment in Europe, which accounts for approximately half of Orad’s revenue, had not impacted its results.

“We feel proud with the significant part that Orad took in the American elections, a project that demonstrates the company’s strength and status as a leading provider in its field. Orad was chosen to supply equipment and services to 4 leading broadcasting networks in the U.S. during and following the election period, and we are currently engaged in a number of processes for the purpose of selling equipment and services to leading media operators in the U.S.A., Europe and Asia,” said Sharir.

Sharir did not provide an update on the company’s continuing evaluation of registration its shares on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, which Orad disclosed earlier this year.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Hi Tec Systems Ltd: Revenues in the first nine months of 2012

Previous Quarter: Revenue Up, Profit Down at Orad in Q2 2012

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Revenue Up, Profit Down at Orad in Q2 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 23 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for the second quarter of 2012 was $10.2m, an increase of 17.1% versus the same period a year ago, and up 13% versus the previous quarter.  

The company did not break out revenue from UK-based MAM provider IBIS, which Orad acquired in 2011.

Net profit for the quarter was $638,000, down 26% versus last year, and down 24% versus last quarter. Net profit in the quarter was impacted by an unspecified finance charge of $209,000.

Gross margins for the quarter were 69% versus 70% last year, and 69.2% last quarter.

Operating income for the quarter was $919,000, up 14% versus last year, and up 33% versus the previous quarter.

Operating expenses were up across the board.  R&D expense for the quarter was $1.4m, or 14% of total revenue, up 24% versus the same period a year ago.  Sales & marketing expenses were $3.8m, or 37% of total revenue in the quarter, up 16% versus the second quarter of 2011. G&A expenses in the quarter were $899,000, or 9% of total revenue, up 1% from last year.

The company ended the quarter with 251 employees, up from 247 last quarter; and $9.6m in cash, compared to $17.6m last year and $9.2m last quarter.

 

First Half 2012 Results

For the first six months of 2012, Orad’s revenue was $19.1m, up 14.5% versus the first half of 2011. 

Net Profit for the 1H 2012 was $1.5m, flat with last year.  Gross Margins for the first half of 2012 were 69%, flat with 2011.

Operating income for 1H 2012 was $1.6m, up 27.7% versus last year.

R&D expenses for the first half of 2012 was $2.8m, or 15% of total revenue, up 15% versus the same period a year ago.  Sales & marketing expenses for 1H 2012 were $6.9m, or 36% of total revenue, up 13% versus the first half of 2011. G&A expenses in the 1H 2012 were $1.9m, or 10% of total revenue, up 7% from last year.

 

Orad CEO Avi Sharir said the company finished the first half of 2012 with the highest level of income in its history, and that weak macroeconomic environment in Europe, which accounts for approximately half of Orad’s revenue, had not impacted its results.

Sharir did not provide an update on the company’s continuing evaluation of registration its shares on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, which Orad disclosed last quarter.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Results for the second quarter and for six months of 2012 

Previous quarter: Orad Revenue Up 12 Percent in Q1 2012 

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Orad Buys 63 Percent of MAM Specialist IBIS for $2.11m

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Orad Revenue Up 12 Percent in Q1 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
May 31 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for the first quarter of 2012 was $9m, an increase of 12% versus the same period a year ago, and down 7% versus the previous quarter.

Net profit for the quarter was $840,000, up 32% versus last year, and down 24% versus last quarter. Gross margins for the quarter were 69.2% versus 68.5% last year, and 65% last quarter.

Operating income for the quarter was $691,000, up 51% versus last year.

The company ended the quarter with $9.2m in cash and 247 employees.

Company CEO Avi Sharir said the quarter results reflect continued revenue growth and profitability, driven by new product introductions such as the VJ server, which contributed approximately 10% of revenue in the quarter. Sharir also said that the company is continuing to evaluate the registration of the Company in the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad – Results for the First Quarter of 2012

Previous Quarter: Orad Top Line Grows 21% in 2011, Profit up 24%

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

The 2012 Big Broadcast Survey

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Apr 03 2012

I am pleased to announce that the 2012 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), our annual study of the broadcast market, has been completed and that the reports from this project will be published soon.

We once again had record-breaking participation in this project.   Almost 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries participated in the 2012 BBS, making it the largest ever and most comprehensive market study of the broadcast industry.  We are humbled by and grateful for the unprecedented participation from so broadcast industry professionals who took the time to contribute to this year’s study.

The 2012 BBS offers unique insight into the broadcast industry by providing information about industry trends, budgets, capital projects, HD and file-based upgrade cycles, and more. It also provides detailed brand data on more than 100 broadcast technology vendors in 30+ product categories (see list in post tags below).

We created the BBS to help our clients, and readers of this website, better understand the issues and trends impacting the broadcast and digital media industries.  We received many positive comments about the BBS from both participants and our research clients, so we feel that we are on the right track and we will continue to publish data about the market on a regular basis.

We will begin to post summary data from the 2012 study on this website, so please check back regularly.

I will also be presenting a summary of the 2012 data on Sunday April 15th at the NAB Show, at a half-day conference session called Media Technology: Strategy and Valuation, which is being produced by Devoncroft, Silverwood Partners and the NAB Show.  It’s free for all registered NAB Show attendees, so please come along.

.

.

Related Content:

Devoncroft – 2012 Broadcast Market Research Reports Now Available

Devoncroft – 2011 Broadcast Market Research Articles

NAB Media Technology: Strategy and Valuation Conference presented by Devoncroft, Silverwood and the NAB

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Orad Top Line Grows 21% in 2011, Profit up 24%

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 01 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for 2011 was $35.3m, up 21% versus the full year 2010.  The company attributed its growth to sales of new products and improved performance in Europe and North America

Net profit for the year was $3.4m, up 24% versus 2010. Gross margins for the year were 69%, down from 70% in 2010.

The results include six months contribution from IBIS, a MAM vendor that was acquired by Orad in August of 2011. On a pro-forma basis, assuming a full year’s contribution from IBIS, Orad reported a profit of $2.96m on revenue of $36.7m.

 

Results for Q4 2011

Orad’s revenue for the fourth quarter of 2011 was $9.6m, up 18% versus the same period a year ago, and up 7% versus the previous quarter.

Net profit for the fourth quarter was $1.1m compared to $0.7 million last year. Gross margins for the fourth quarter were 65% versus 58% last year.

Orad president & CEO Avi Sharir was upbeat about the results saying  “We are publishing today record results for the company, both in terms of revenue for 2011 and its fourth quarter, and in terms of net profit. Revenue growth in 2011 was due to the launch of new products and a double-digit growth in sales in Europe and North America. We increased orders, particularly in the second half of the year and we anticipate continued growth in 2012 mainly from large sporting events like Euro 2012 and London Olympics, and due to the U.S. Presidential elections.”

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Announces Results for the fourth quarter and for full year of 2011

Previous Quarter Press Release: Results for the third quarter and for the nine months of 2011

Previous Year Press Release: Results for the fourth quarter and for full year of 2010

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Orad Buys 63 Percent of MAM Specialist IBIS for $2.11m

.

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 4 – the 2011 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Oct 25 2011

This is the seventh in a series of articles about some of the findings from the 2011 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands.  More than 8,000 people in 100+ countries took part in the 2011 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.

.

Each year, as part of the Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), we ask broadcast professionals worldwide to rank a variety of technology vendor brands on a wide range of metrics.  We use this information to create a series of reports, which through benchmarking and industry “league tables” enable each vendors to understand its position in the market relative to their the industry as a whole as well as their direct competitors.

In previous articles we wrote about the 2011 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, the 2011 BBS Net Change in Overall Opinion League Table, and the 2011 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table.

This post looks at one of the most important metrics for any technology company – innovation.

The product side of the film & broadcast industry is driven by technology and innovation.  All vendors spend heavily on research and development in order to create advanced technologies that make their products stand out from the competition.  Thus innovation is a very  important component of the brand image and reputation of vendors in this space.

To find out which broadcast technology vendors are considered to be most highly regarded in terms of innovation, respondents were asked to rank broadcast technology vendor brands for “Innovation” on a scale of 1-10 – with 10 being best in the market, and 1 being worst in the market.  The top 30 ranked brands for innovation are shown below for the global sample of all respondents.

Please note that these results are shown in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked in the study. 

 .

2011 BBS Innovation League Table:

.

There are a wide variety of companies on this list, including large and small firms; single product and multi-product firms; global and regional players; and audio and video technology providers.

Let’s look specifically at the how these companies and their products were ranked in the 2011 BBS, beginning with products and technology.

As shown in the chart below, these companies make products in 23 of the 26 product categories that we covered in the 2011 BBS.

The top products for brand leaders are split between audio and video – with microphones, signal processing and video transport each appearing five times.

 .

2011 BBS Innovation League Table — Frequency of Product Categories:

.

The 2011 BBS Innovation League Table is split fairly evenly between audio and video companies.  There’s also a healthy mix of hardware versus software products represented on this list.

Does company size play a role in innovation?  Larger companies offer more products and are consequently used in more places than their smaller counterparts.  But this does not necessarily translate into innovation.

As shown below, innovative products are produced by both small focused companies, as well as by larger multi-product vendors.

Let’s look at the number of product categories that each of these brands produces (as defined by the segmentation used in the 2011 BBS).

The table below shows the number of 2011 BBS product categories produced by each brand.

 ..

2011 BBS Innovation League Table — Number of 2011 BBS Product Categories per Brand:

 

.

As shown in the table above, vendors producing products in only one 2011 BBS category account for more than half of the vendors in the top 30 innovation list.  This suggests that focused companies who apply their efforts to specialist product areas are often able to generate more innovation in the eyes of the market.

At the same time, larger companies are also represented on this list of the broadcast industry’s top innovators.  For example, Grass Valley is covered in 8 product categories in the 2011 BBS, while both Evertz and Snell are covered in five product categories.  These are examples of larger companies who have managed to instill innovation across their product lines.

Of course, companies are listed here based on how many 2011 BBS product categories they produce, which is not an absolute measure of the products produced be each vendor. There are some very large companies on the list above who appear in just one 2011 BBS category. In total, the 2011 BBS looked at 118 vendors in 26 separate product categories (based on the IABM’s industry model), but even so it did not necessarily cover the entire product range of all vendors.

Please keep in mind when reviewing this information that all data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, not in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2011 BBS.  Also, the charts in this posting measure the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2011 BBS respondents, regardless of their company type, company size, geographic location, job title and budget for broadcast technology products.  Finally please note that this study evaluated a total of 118 brands.

 .

In order to get full value from this data, it is necessary to evaluate these results on a granular basis.  If you would like more information, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

 .

.

This article is based on the findings from the 2011 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of industry trends, technology purchasing behavior and the opinion of vendor brands.  With more than 8,000 people in 100+ countries participating, the 2011 BBS is the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.

.

Devoncroft Partners has published a variety of reports from 2011 BBS data.  For more information, please get in touch.

.

.

 

Related Content:

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 3 – the 2011 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 2 – the 2011 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 1 – the 2011 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Where is Money Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry in 2011? The 2011 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Tracking Changes in Broadcast Industry Trends — 2011 Versus 2010

Broadcast Industry’s Most Comprehensive Market Study Reveals Top Trends of 2011

More Information About the 2011 Big Broadcast Survey from Devoncroft Partners

.

.

 

 

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Orad Buys 63 Percent of MAM Specialist IBIS for $2.11m

Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jul 20 2011

Graphics and virtual set specialist Orad announced that it will acquire 63.38% of Integrated Broadcast Information Systems Limited, (IBIS), a provider of Broadcast Media Asset Management (MAM) solutions, for $2.11m in cash.  Orad also has the option to increase its holdings to 100% within the next 54 months at a price dependent on the future revenues and net profits. Completion of the transaction is expected within the next 3 months.

IBIS, which specializes MAM for fast turn-around file based workflows in news and sports environments, has customers including ESPN Star Sports, the BBC and the Irish Parliament, Dublin.

Avi Sharir President and CEO of Orad commented “we are extremely happy with the acquisition of IBIS. We see many synergies between  IBIS’s portfolio and Orad’s graphics and video server range of solutions. The integrated solution between Orad and IBIS will further enhance Orad’s position in the sport and news market segments, offering our customers significant added value”

 

Related Content:

Press Release:  Orad enhances its sports solutions with an investment for 63% of the fast turnaround MAM vendor – IBIS

The 2011 Big Broadcast Survey – Now Available

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, Broadcast technology channel strategy, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 10 2011

After many months of work, I am pleased to announce that the 2011 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) has been completed, and that reports from the study will be published soon.

If you’re not familiar with the BBS, it’s an annual demand-side study of the global broadcast industry. BBS reports help readers improve their strategic decision making, customer engagement, marketing strategy, product planning, and sales execution.

More than 8,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries participated in the 2011 BBS, making it by far the largest and most comprehensive market study of the broadcast industry.

Three types of reports are available:

  • The BBS Global Market Report is the broadcast industry’s first global demand-based study of the purchasing habits of technology buyers.  This report examines industry trends, major projects being planned, products being evaluated for purchase, current and future plant infrastructure and operational structure, broadcast technology budgets, and HD upgrade plans for a wide variety of products.

 

  • BBS Global Brand Reports are available for more than 100 broadcast technology vendors.  These reports provide deep insight into how each company is perceived by the market, along with comprehensive benchmarking of broadcast technology vendors on a wide variety of metrics, through a series of league table rankings

 

  • Twenty-six separate 2011 BBS Product Reports provide detailed vendor brand ranking for individual product categories. These reports enable users to benchmark their brand directly against specific competitors through a detailed understanding of the opinions of technology buyers who purchase, specify or use each product type.  

.

If you would like information about these reports and how they can help your business, please get in touch.

In addition to these paid-for reports, we will also be publishing highlights from the study on the Devoncroft website.  These articles will be posted on a semi-regular basis, so please check back often.   

You’ll also be seeing information from the 2011 BBS in a wide variety of other industry websites and trade magazines.

The tables below show the product categories and broadcast technology vendor brands covered in the 2011 BBS.

..

 Product Categories Covered in the 2011 BBS:

.

.

Broadcast Technology Brands Covered in the 2011 BBS:

.

.

 

Innovation Rankings for Broadcast Technology Vendors — The Top 30 Globally

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jun 16 2010

This is the third in a series of posts about the how the brands of broadcast technology vendors were ranked by respondents to the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS). 

Each year as part of the Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global sample of broadcast professionals are asked to rank their opinion of a number of technology vendor brands on a wide range of metrics.  This information is used to create a series of reports, which through benchmarking and industry “league tables” enable these vendors to understand their competitive position in the market. 

More than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participated in the 2010 BBS, making this the largest ever and most comprehensive study of the broadcast industry. In addition to measuring a variety of broadcast industry trends, more than 100 vendor brands (in 27 separate product categories) were evaluated by respondents. 

Recently, I discussed how respondents to the 2010 BBS ranked The Top 30 Broadcast Technology Vendor Brands by Overall Opinion, Ranked, Globally and Regionally, and followed up with a ranking of the Top 30 Broadcast Vendor Brands by Net Change in Brand Image

In keeping with the theme of top 30 rankings, let’s now turn to one of the most important metrics for any technology company – innovation

The product side of the film & broadcast industry is driven by technology and innovation.  All vendors strive to create techniques that will make their products stand out from the competition.  Thus innovation is a very important component of the brand image and reputation of vendors in this space. 

To find out which broadcast technology vendors are considered to be most highly regarded in terms of innovation, more than 4,000 broadcast industry professionals were  asked to rank broadcast technology vendor brands for “Innovation” on a scale of 1-10 — with 10 being best in the market, and 1 being worst in the market.  The top 30 ranked brands for overall opinion are shown below for the global sample of all respondents. 

In all cases, these results are shown in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked by respondents to the survey.   

Innovation — The top 30 broadcast technology brands, listed alphabetically (global sample of all respondents) 

There’s a broad mix of vendors included in the above table including both audio and video and audio companies.  There are also interesting similarities and differences in terms of the types of products produced, geographic location and company size (something that is not measured in the BBS and won’t be discussed further here)..  So let’s look a little deeper into these results. 

 

.

Number of products per vendor 

One obvious question that should be asked when reviewing these results is how many products are produced by each vendor on this list.  This will help us to understand if whether innovation comes from small focused companies, or large multi-product vendors.    

A breakdown of how many product categories are produced by each vendor on the top 30 innovation list is shown below: 

 

It’s interesting to note that vendors producing just one product account for more than half of the vendors in the top 30 innovation list.  This suggests that focused companies who apply their efforts to specialist product areas are often able to generate more innovation in the eyes of the market.  

Nevertheless it’s also worth pointing out that large companies can also be considered industry innovators. For example Grass Valley is covered in 10 product categories in the 2010 BBS and Avid is covered in 7 product categories.  These are examples of large companies who have managed to remain instill innovation across their product lines. 

Please keep in mind that this is not an absolute measure of the products produced be each vendor.  In total, the 2010 BBS looked at 148 vendors in 27 separate product categories (based on the IABM’s industry model), but even so it did not necessarily cover the entire product range of all vendors. 

 

.

Geographic Location 

Another factor to consider is the geographic location of each company on the list.  By this measure, companies headquartered in EMEA just edged out those based in North America on the top 20 innovation list, while companies based in Asia trailed the pack.  

 

This is not surprising since this broadly reflects where the companies on the overall list are based.  

In terms of individual countries, the USA leads the way with 10 companies on the list of the 30 top innovators, with Germany close behind with 6 vendors on the list. 

When looking at geography, it’s important to remember that many of these firms are truly global, with offices all over the world, regardless of where they are headquartered. 

 

.

Product Categories 

Finally, let’s look at the product categories produced by the vendors who made the top 30 innovation list for the 2010 BBS:

Out of the 27 product categories covered in the 2010 BBS, 23 appear on this list; showing that innovation is widespread across the broadcast industry.

Signal processing, studio cameras and video editing lead the list of products produced by the top 30 innovation leaders.

.

Please keep in mind when reviewing this information that, unless otherwise specified, all data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, not in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2010 BBS.  Also, the charts in this posting measure the responses of all 2010 BBS respondents, regardless of their company type, company size, geographic location, job title and budget for broadcast technology products.  

In order to get full value from this data, it is necessary to evaluate these results on a granular basis.  If you would like more information, please contact Devoncroft Partners. 

This article is based on the findings from the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of industry trends, technology purchasing behavior and the opinion of vendor brands.  With more than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participating, the 2010 version of the BBS is the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.