Posts Tagged ‘MAM’

Orad Revenue Declines 29% in Q2 2013, Announces 10% Workforce Reduction

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 20 2013

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was $7.2m, down 29% versus the same period a year ago, and up 1% versus the previous quarter.

 “The lower level of activity which started in Q3 2012, mostly due to the economic situation in Europe, continued through the second quarter of 2013, as reflected in the disappointing results for the second quarter and also for the first half of the year,” said Orad CEO Avi Sharir.

Orad has been struggling since the third quarter of last year, particularly in Europe, which is the company’s largest market. In February 2013, the Orad issued a profit warning for the full year 2012, saying at that time that it expected its profit to fall by about 34 percent.

The company’s results in Q2 2013 show that the company continues to struggle in the European market. However, the company also reported a bright spot in an otherwise disappointing quarter, saying that its order intake increased during the quarter. “We are happy to announce that during Q2 2013 we booked the highest volume of orders ever in Orad’s history, setting a new record,” said Sharir.

Orad’s product revenue in the quarter was $5.6m (78% of total revenue), down 33% versus the same period last year, and up 7% versus the previous quarter.  Service revenue in the quarter was $1.6m, down 11% versus last year, and down 14% versus the previous quarter.

The net loss for the second quarter of 2013 was $1.3m, or -$0.11 per share, compared to a net profit of $732,000 or $0.06per share last year, and a net loss of $944,000, or $0.08 per share last quarter. 

Including additional charges in the quarter, the total comprehensive loss for the second quarter of 2013 was $1.375m, compared to total comprehensive income of $507,000 last year, and a total comprehensive loss of $1m last quarter.

Gross margins for the quarter were 63% versus 69% last year, and 65% last quarter.

The operating loss for the quarter was $1.46m, compared to an operating profit of $1m last year, and and operating loss of $657,000 last quarter.

Operating expenses for the quarter were $6m (83% of total revenue), down slightly from last year, and up 14% versus the previous quarter.

R&D costs for the second quarter of 2013 were $1.45m, up 5% versus the same period last year, and down 5% compared to last quarter.  R&D costs were 20% of total revenue in the quarter, compared to 14% of total revenue last year, and 21% of total revenue last quarter.

Sales and marketing expenses in the quarter were $3.7m, down 2% versus the same period last year, and up 29% compared to last quarter.  Sales and marketing costs accounted for 51% of total revenue in the quarter, compared to 37% of total revenue last year, and 40% of total revenue last quarter.

Following the company’s sharp rise in sales and marketing costs this quarter, Sharir says that Orad will continue to spend in this area.  “We also continue to invest in our sales and marketing infrastructure and in particular have put emphasis on strengthening our North America office with the addition of a few senior people,” he said.

General and administrative expenses in the quarter were $853,000, down 4% versus the same period last year, and down 4% compared to last quarter.  G&A costs accounted for 12% of total revenue in the quarter, compared to 9% of total revenue last year, and 12% of total revenue last quarter.

The company ended the quarter with $5.6m in cash equivalents and restricted cash, compared to $9.6m last year, and $7.2m last quarter.

 

Announcement of 10 Percent Workforce Reduction

Although the company says it had strong order intake during the second quarter of 2013, Sharir says it’s “too early to tell if we reached a turning point in the level of activity, but it is certainly a very encouraging sign.”

“As a measure of caution, we have decided to align our operating expenses with our current financial results, and have decided to reorganize some departments, reducing our overall headcount by 10% and trim other operational costs as well. The result of these measures will be seen in the lower cost of operating expenses expected as of the fourth quarter of 2013. The decrease in our operational expenses will not affect our continuous focus on strategic initiatives.”

 

First Half 2013 Results

For the first six months of 2013, Orad’s revenue was $14.4m, down 24.7% versus the first half of 2012.

The net loss for the first six months of 2013 was $2.2m, compared to net income of $1.7m for the first half of 2012.

Gross Margins for the first half of 2013 were 64%, down from 69% for the first six months of 2012.

The operating loss for the first six months of 2013 was $2.1m compared to operating income of $1.8m for the first six months of 2012.

Operating expenses in the first six months of 2013 were $11.3m, or 78% of total revenue, down 1% versus last year when total operating expenses accounted for 60% of overall revenue.

R&D expenses for the first half of 2013 was $3m, or 20% of total revenue, up 9% versus the same period a year ago when R&D accounted for 15% of revenue,

Sales & marketing expenses for the first six months of 2013 $6.6m, or 45% of total revenue, down 3% % versus the first half of 2012 when sales and marketing accounted for 45% of revenue.

General and administrative expenses for the first six months of 2013 were $1.7m, or 12% of total revenue, down 9% versus the first half of 2012 when G&A expenses were or 10% of total revenue.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Results for the second quarter and for six months of 2013

Previous Year: Revenue Up, Profit Down at Orad in Q2 2012

Previous Quarter: Orad: Results for the First Quarter

Orad Warns of Lower Revenue, Net Loss in Q4 2012 of 2013

 

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

 

Dalet Up 7 Percent in Q2 2013 Thanks to Big Jump in Americas Revenue

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 01 2013

MAM and newsroom specialist Dalet reported that its consolidated revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was €7.9m, up 7% versus the same period a year ago, and up 7% versus the previous quarter.

The company said that sales in the Americas increased by 21%, and the region now accounts for 40% of consolidated revenue. The increase in Americas revenue may be due in its win at Fox Sports 1, which is using Dalet’s “Sports Factory” as the end-to-end production and MAM system.  Fox Sports 1 launches on August 17, 2013.

Europe accounted for 48% of revenue, while MEA and Asia-Pacific accounted for 8% and 4% respectively.

Gross margins for the second quarter of 2013 were 88%, up from 86% last year, and up from 85% last quarter.

The company did not disclose any other financial metrics, including profitability.

 

1H 2013 Results:

For the first six months of 2013, the company’s consolidated revenue was €15.3m, up 1% versus the first half of 2012.

Gross margins for the first half of 2013 were €13.3m, or 87%, up from €12.7m, or 83% for the first six months of 2012.

Unusually, the company did not provide any detail on its order backlog. At the end of the previous quarter (Q1 2013), the company said its order backlog expected to be invoiced in 2013 was €20 million.

.

.

Press Release: Dalet Revenues for First Semester 2013: €15.3 Million

Dalet Issues Final 2012 Results, Revenue Up 10 Percent

Dalet Reports 10 Percent Revenue Growth in 2012 Thanks to Strong MAM Sales

Previous Year: Dalet Revenue Increases 4 Percent in Q2 2012

Press Release: Fox Chooses Dalet Sports Factory for New Sports Network

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

Broadcast Technology Products Being Evaluated for Purchase in 2013 – 2014

broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jul 03 2013

This is the fourth in a series of articles about some of the findings from Devoncroft’s 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. 

 

Previous articles about the 2013 BBS discussed the most important broadcast industry trends, how the relative commercial importance of broadcast industry trends have changed over time, and where money is currently being spent in the broadcast industry.

This article expands on the findings of the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index by drilling down into the specific product categories that are being evaluated for purchase this year by our global sample of nearly 10,000 broadcast technology end-users in 100+ countries.

We presented research participant with a list of relevant product categories and asked to indicate which ones they are currently evaluating for purchase.

The results are shown in the chart below.

 

2013 BBS -- Product Being Evaluated for Purchase

 

In 2013 it is likely that production technology – such as video editing systems, camera-related products, and audio technology – will be in demand as broadcast professionals continue to upgrade their facilities to HDTV operations.

The new studios, OB vans, and channels that broadcasters have planned and budgeted for will drive the evaluation and purchase of a wide variety of equipment including studio cameras, production switchers, multiviewers, automation, storage, and transmission encoders. As always, test & measurement products will be required for these new facilities.

Strong interest in multi-platform content delivery is driving interest in products and services such as ingest/ streaming/ transcoding and online video delivery platforms.

The ongoing transition to file-based/tapeless workflows will drive the evaluation and purchase of products such as near-line/off-line/archival storage, production servers, and playout automation.

All of the above will likely benefit software-oriented systems such as workflow / asset management, library/storage management, and broadcast business management systems. These products help broadcast technology increase their operational efficiency by facilitating content storage & search; linear and multi-platform playout & distribution; and of course monetization.

 

The information in this article is based on select findings from the 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. The BBS is published annually by Devoncroft Partners.

Unless otherwise specified, all data in this article measures the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2013 BBS, regardless of factors such as organization type, organization size, job title, purchasing and geographic location.  Please be aware that responses of individual organization types or geographic locations may be very different. Granular analysis of these results is available as part of various paid-for reports based on the 2013 BBS data set. For more information about this report, please contact Devoncroft Partners

.

.

Related Content:

The 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) – overview of available reports, including covered brands and product categories

Largest Ever Study of Broadcast Market Reveals Most Important Industry Trends for 2013

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013

Analyzing Where Money is Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Devoncroft Partners: 2013 Broadcast Industry Market Research Findings

.

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

 

 

Analyzing Where Money is Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jul 01 2013

This is the third in a series of articles about some of the findings from Devoncroft’s 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. 

 

In a previous article, we published the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index, which shows how a global sample of nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals ranked a set of broadcast industry trends in terms of the commercial importance of each one to their business.

This was followed by a post called Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013, which examined how the relative commercial importance of broadcast industry trends have changed over time.

Rather than looking at industry trends, which are often an indicator of what might happen in the future, this article examines what technology products and services are actually being purchased today by broadcasters and media companies globally.

.

 

The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index (which can be found here) showed that the top-ranked broadcast industry trend in 2013 is “multi-platform content delivery.”  Other important trends include “file-based workflows,” “IP networking and content delivery,” and the “transition to HDTV operations.”

The 2013 BBS Trend Index includes a mix of current and future commercial priorities, some of which have already been widely deployed, on a wide scale, some of which are currently being trialed, and others which have not yet been widely implemented. Industry trends evolve and change over time, so tracking this evolution is helpful to better understand what customers are discussing and thinking about implementing in the future.

However, a top ranking in an industry trend Index does not necessarily translate into where broadcast technology buyers are actually spending their budgets in 2013 and 2014. Therefore, it’s important to make a clear distinction between what broadcast customers are thinking and talking about doing in the future (trends), and where they are spending their technology budgets today (projects).

Technology spending in the broadcast industry is typically project-based. Real (budgeted) projects are where broadcast technology budgets are being spent today, not just what people are talking about doing in the future.

Capital projects come in many forms.  They might include international elections, sporting championships, new services designed to attract incremental revenue, and the long-term planned capital upgrades of broadcast infrastructure and facilities.

In order to better understand this dynamic, we presented 2013 BBS participants with a list of 18 projects (determined based on feedback of BBS stakeholders), and asked them to indicate which of these projects they are currently in the process of implementing or have budgeted to implement within the next year.

Unlike industry trend data, which highlights what respondents are thinking/talking about doing in the future, this information provides direct feedback about what major capital projects are being implemented by broadcast technology end-users around the world, and provides useful insight into the capital expenditure plans of the industry.

Taken together, information about trends and projects collected in the 2013 BBS can be used to understand the difference between “trend and spend,” and/or hype and reality.

 

The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index, shown below, measures the number of projects that research participants are currently implementing or have budgeted to implement.

2013 BBS -- 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

 

Comparing the above chart with the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index illustrates the difference between what end-users are thinking and talking about (trends), and where they are actually planning to spend their budgets today (projects).

While “multi-platform content delivery” was this year’s top-ranked trend, when it comes to where money is actually being spent in 2013, more broadcast technology buyers said that they have budgeted for “upgrading infrastructure for HD/ 3Gbps operations” than any other project.

This finding is consistent with our previous research. Upgrading infrastructure for HD / 3Gbps operations has consistently been the top driver of broadcast technology spending for the past several years, and this is once again the case in 2013.

This year’s top project correlates directly with “transition to HDTV operations,” which was ranked #4 in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index.

The projects ranked #3, #4, #5, #7, #9, and #12 in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index – “upgrading cameras,” “upgrading transmission & distribution capabilities;” “building new studios / OB vans;” “launching new channels;” and “upgrading newsroom operations” – are also related to the transition to HDTV operations. These new cameras, transmission upgrades, new studios, new channels, and upgraded news environments will almost certainly be at least HD capable, if not fully HD.

In some cases, industry trends and budgeted projects line up nicely. In others however, there are significant differences.

A good example of the latter is “multi-platform content delivery,” which has been the top-ranked trend in the BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index since 2010, and dominated the Index this year.  However, the corresponding project measured in the chart above, “distribute and monetize content on multiple distribution platforms,” ranked #10 out of 18 in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index, significantly below items ranked much lower in the BBS Trend Index.

These findings are consistent with previous BBS studies, as well as our other research in the professional broadcast technology marketplace.

Despite strong interest in multi-platform content delivery, it appears that creating a sustainable (and profitable) business model for distributing and monetizing content on multiple digital distribution platforms has proven elusive to date for both end-users and technology vendors.

We have conducted numerous projects about multi-platform business models that involved interviewing senior executives from broadcasters and media companies. Although these executives immediately agree that getting to “multi-platform nirvana” is strategically important to their organizations, many readily admit that they have yet to find the right business model.

Many broadcasters and content owners believe that in order to achieve increased revenue and profitability in a multi-platform world, they must first dramatically increase their efficiency through the implementation of new workflows and technical systems, some of which do not yet exist.

This implies that there are likely to be significant opportunities in the future for broadcast technology vendors that are able to solve the technical, operational, and business challenges facing end-users who see multi-platform distribution and monetization as a critical part of their business strategy.

It also helps explain why “file-based/tapeless workflows” was ranked #2 in the 2013 BBS Trend Index, with many research participants saying it is the industry trend that is most important commercially to their businesses over the next few years.

Indeed, a number of capital projects are being implemented in 2013-14 are directly related to “file-based/tapeless workflows” trend. Examples of this are “cloud technology/cloud services,” “workflow / asset-management,” “archive-related projects,’ and “automating workflows.”

In particular, the #2 ranked project in 2013 — “install or enhance workflow / asset management system” – is an area where there has been a great deal of recent activity. Although it may seem that MAM has been set to become “the next big thing” for the past decade or so, it now appears that broadcasters are increasingly focusing on MAM deployments.

One reason for this could be that many end-users believe that in order to be profitable in a multi-platform world, they must significantly increase the efficiency of their operations, and broader use of MAM is seen as one part of solution.

Indeed, in a recent Devoncroft project, more than half of the senior executives from broadcasters and media companies we interviewed cited multi-platform content distribution as the factor that will drive the most change in their organizations over the next few years; and because of this, more than two-thirds predicted their spending on MAM and workflow tools will increase over the next two years.

The remainder of the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index offers a mixed picture of project activity across the world, and includes everything from upgrading audio and newsrooms to migrating infrastructure from copper to fiber.

And as seen in the 2013 BBS Trend Index, some projects are being planned as the direct result of government or corporate mandates. “Prepare for analog switch-off” is the best example of this.  In the territories where governments have mandated a switch to digital broadcasting, tremendous planning and focus is being devoted to these projects, resulting in strong revenue for transmission and distribution-related products and services.

Interestingly, despite the fact that they may have the potential to deliver increased efficiencies and new revenue streams, some very large projects appear towards the bottom of this list. For example, “consolidate operations in regional hubs (centralcasting),” and “outsourced operations (playout),” are the bottom ranked projects in 2013. This is because although these are high value projects, they will be undertaken by a relatively small number of organizations — i.e. large broadcasters.  This highlights that the 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index is a graphic representation of the number of all planned projects across all respondents, regardless of organization type, size, or location.  It does not measure size, value, or relative commercial importance of planned projects.  Please keep this in mind when reading this information and interpreting these findings.

.

The information in this article is based on select findings from the 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. The BBS is published annually by Devoncroft Partners.

Unless otherwise specified, all data in this article measures the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2013 BBS, regardless of factors such as organization type, organization size, job title, purchasing and geographic location.  Please be aware that responses of individual organization types or geographic locations may be very different. Granular analysis of these results is available as part of various paid-for reports based on the 2013 BBS data set. For more information about this report, please contact Devoncroft Partners

.

.

Related Content:

The 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) – overview of available reports, including covered brands and product categories

Largest Ever Study of Broadcast Market Reveals Most Important Industry Trends for 2013

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013

Devoncroft Partners: 2013 Broadcast Industry Market Research Findings

Previous Year: The 2012 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

.

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

 

 

Dalet Issues Final 2012 Results, Revenue Up 10 Percent

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Apr 12 2013

MAM specialist Dalet announced that its board of directors have approved the company’s consolidated financial statements for the 2012 fiscal year.

Consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 was €34.4m m, compared to €31.3 m (+10%) in 2011.

Gross margin for the year was €29.7m, compared to €25.2m in 2011. The gross margin rate for 2012 increased from 81% in 2011 to 86%, due to the strong shift away from the Italian subsidiary’s traditional hardware integration business in its domestic market.

The operating profit before non-recurring items for the year was €1.7m, compared to €1.3m in 2011 (+29%).
After taking into account a depreciation of the goodwill of the Italian subsidiary for €0.2 m, the operating profit was €1.5m.
Consolidated net profit for 2012 was €1.2m, compared to €1.3m in 2011.

The company ended the year with €6.5m in cash, up from €5.1m at the end of 2011, and long term debt increased from €1.1m to €1.6m.

Dalet CEO David Lasry said “In 2012 we continued a steady growth trend in revenue and profitability which has confirmed our strategy to provide MAM-driven solution to key market segments. The growth in North America has been significant, especially as related to the sports segment where we are achieving a recognized presence with several successful project deployments and new contracts.”

.

.

Related Content:

Dalet Press Release: Financial Results for 2012

Dalet Reports 10 Percent Revenue Growth in 2012 Thanks to Strong MAM Sales

Previous Year: Dalet Revenue Jumps 22 Percent in 2011, Reports Strong Backlog for 2012

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Orad Warns of Lower Revenue, Net Loss in Q4 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Feb 27 2013

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad disclosed that it expects its Q4 2012 revenue to be in the range of between approximately $ 6.9m and $7.1m, 18% to 21% lower than the third quarter of 2012.

As a result of the lower revenue, the company says it now expects to report a net loss in the range of $600,000 to $800,000 for the fourth quarter of 2012.

The company said its Q4 2012 revenue decline was “largely due to the economic weakening of Orad’s target markets, particularly Europe. The uncertainties in the economic environment have led to lengthening of sales cycles and to delay of some customers’ investment decisions.”

Orad says that it now expects to report a net profit in the range of $1m to $1.2m for the full year 2012, 27% to 34% lower than last year.

This announcement appears to be a continuation of the decline in European revenue that Orad began to experience in the third quarter of 2012.  The company’s revenue in the third quarter of 2012 was $8.8m, down 2.7% versus the same period a year ago, and down 14% versus the previous quarter. At that time, company CEO Avi Sharir said the company’s Q3 results were impacted by a slowdown in its markets, especially in Europe.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Ad-hoc-Disclosure According to § 15 WpHG

European Slowdown Results in Lower Revenue and Profit for Orad in Q3 2012

Orad Top Line Grows 21% in 2011, Profit up 24%

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

European Slowdown Results in Lower Revenue and Profit for Orad in Q3 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Nov 19 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for the third quarter of 2012 was $8.8m, down 2.7% versus the same period a year ago, and down 14% versus the previous quarter.

Company CEO Avi Sharir said the company’s Q3 results were impacted by a slowdown in its markets, especially in Europe.

Net profit for the quarter was $122,000, down 85% versus last year, and down 81% versus last quarter.

Gross margins for the quarter were 67% versus 71% last year, and 69% last quarter.

Operating income for the third quarter was $11,000, down from $1.036m last year, and $919,000 last quarter.

Operating expenses for the quarter were $5.87m, up 9% versus last year.

R&D expense for the quarter was $1.4m, or 16% of total revenue, up 7% versus the same period a year ago, and flat versus the previous quarter.

Sales & marketing expenses were $3.57m, or 41% of total revenue in the quarter, up 17% versus the third quarter of 2011, and down 6% versus the previous quarter.

G&A expenses in the quarter were $897,000, or 10% of total revenue, down 12% from last year, and flat with the previous quarter.

The company ended the quarter with 261 employees, up from 251 last quarter; and $8.3m in cash, down from $13.1m last year, and $9.6m last quarter.

 

Year-to-date Revenue up 8.5 Percent

For the first nine months of 2012, Orad’s revenue was $27.9m, up 8.5% versus the first nine months of 2011. The company attributed the YTD revenue increase to new products and expansion into new geographic territories.

Net Profit for the first nine months of 2012 was $1.6m, down 30% versus the same period a year ago.

Gross Margins for the first nine months of 2012 were 68%, down from 70% for the same period a year ago.

Operating income for first nine months of 2012 was $1.621m, down 29% versus last year.

R&D expenses for the first nine months of 2012 was $4.22m, or 15% of total revenue, up 12% versus the same period a year ago.  Sales & marketing expenses for first nine months of 2012 were $10.487m, or 38% of total revenue, up 14% versus the same period last year. Year-to-date G&A expenses were $2.795m, or 10% of total revenue, essentially flat with last year.

 

Sharir said that the company’s revenue in the first nine months of 2012 grew by 8% versus the same period in 2011, but that revenue in the third quarter of 2012 was impacted by a slowdown in its main markets, especially in Europe.  This is a contrast to last quarter when the company said that weak macroeconomic environment in Europe, which accounts for approximately half of Orad’s revenue, had not impacted its results.

“We feel proud with the significant part that Orad took in the American elections, a project that demonstrates the company’s strength and status as a leading provider in its field. Orad was chosen to supply equipment and services to 4 leading broadcasting networks in the U.S. during and following the election period, and we are currently engaged in a number of processes for the purpose of selling equipment and services to leading media operators in the U.S.A., Europe and Asia,” said Sharir.

Sharir did not provide an update on the company’s continuing evaluation of registration its shares on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, which Orad disclosed earlier this year.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Hi Tec Systems Ltd: Revenues in the first nine months of 2012

Previous Quarter: Revenue Up, Profit Down at Orad in Q2 2012

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Orad Top Line Grows 21% in 2011, Profit up 24%

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 01 2012

Graphics and media asset management (MAM) provider Orad reported that its revenue for 2011 was $35.3m, up 21% versus the full year 2010.  The company attributed its growth to sales of new products and improved performance in Europe and North America

Net profit for the year was $3.4m, up 24% versus 2010. Gross margins for the year were 69%, down from 70% in 2010.

The results include six months contribution from IBIS, a MAM vendor that was acquired by Orad in August of 2011. On a pro-forma basis, assuming a full year’s contribution from IBIS, Orad reported a profit of $2.96m on revenue of $36.7m.

 

Results for Q4 2011

Orad’s revenue for the fourth quarter of 2011 was $9.6m, up 18% versus the same period a year ago, and up 7% versus the previous quarter.

Net profit for the fourth quarter was $1.1m compared to $0.7 million last year. Gross margins for the fourth quarter were 65% versus 58% last year.

Orad president & CEO Avi Sharir was upbeat about the results saying  “We are publishing today record results for the company, both in terms of revenue for 2011 and its fourth quarter, and in terms of net profit. Revenue growth in 2011 was due to the launch of new products and a double-digit growth in sales in Europe and North America. We increased orders, particularly in the second half of the year and we anticipate continued growth in 2012 mainly from large sporting events like Euro 2012 and London Olympics, and due to the U.S. Presidential elections.”

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Orad Announces Results for the fourth quarter and for full year of 2011

Previous Quarter Press Release: Results for the third quarter and for the nine months of 2011

Previous Year Press Release: Results for the fourth quarter and for full year of 2010

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Orad Buys 63 Percent of MAM Specialist IBIS for $2.11m

.

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

%d bloggers like this: