Posts Tagged ‘Harmonic’

Harmonic Revenue Declines 14 Percent in Q1 2013

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Apr 25 2013

Harmonic announced that it revenue for the first quarter of 2013 was $101.7m, down a decline of 14% versus the same period a year ago, and a decline of 13% versus the previous quarter.

The GAAP net loss for the quarter was $9.5m, or ($0.08) per share, compared with a GAAP net loss of $8.7m, or ($0.07) per share, during the same period last year, and GAAP of $0.9m, or $0.01 per share in the previous quarter.

On a non-GAAP basis, the net loss for the first quarter of 2013 was $2.7m, or ($0.02) per share, compared with non-GAAP net income of $2.2m, or $0.02 per share, during the same period last year, and non-GAAP net income of $8.3m, or $0.07 per share, during the previous quarter.

These figures exclude revenue from the company’s cable Access HFC business, which was sold to Aurora Networks for $46m on March 5, 2013. GAAP net income from discontinued operations, excluding the $15.0m gain on the sale of Cable Access HFC, was $1m, or $0.01 per share. Non-GAAP net income from discontinued operations, excluding the gain on the sale of the Cable Access HFC business, was also $1m, or $0.01 per share.

The results were at the low end of the company’s previously issued revenue guidance of net revenue in the first quarter of 2013 to be in the range of $100m to $110m, down from $115m to $125m prior to the sale of the cable access business. However, they were below the consensus estimates of equity analysts who were looking for revenue of $110.8m and a profit of $0.01 per share.

International markets accounted for 58% of total revenue in the quarter, up from 52% last year, and down from 62% last quarter. Harmonic CEO Patrick Harshman said that the company’s international growth was driven largely by improvement in the EMEA region, which had recorded its best quarterly intake since 2011. Harshman said that the “lion’s share” of EMEA demand was coming from northern Europe, eastern Europe and Russia.

However, Harshman cautioned that revenue from domestic service providers continued to be challenged, continuing the trend from the previous quarter.

On a product basis, production and playout (Omneon product sales minus associated service revenue) represented 22% of revenue this quarter compared to 18% for the same quarter last year. Cable edge business represented 17% of revenue, a decrease from 22% of revenue last year. Service and support business increased to 19% of revenue from 15% for the same quarter last year.

On a segment basis, broadcast & media represented 38% of revenue, cable represented 39%, and satellite and telco represented 23% of revenue.

GAAP gross margin for the quarter were 45%, up from 43% last year.  Non-GAAP gross margins were 51%, up from 49% last quarter, and down from 56% last quarter.  Harmonic CFO Carolyn Aver said that the company’s gross margins last quarter were unusually high and not expected to be repeated in the first quarter.  The company had previously said that it expected gross margins for the quarter to be in the range of 51.5% to 52.5%.

Harshman attributed the margin expansion to “both an increase from recent run rate margins due to the divestiture of the margin-diluted access business and a reduction from the high-margin software heavy mix that of the previous quarter.”

The GAAP operating margin for the quarter was -15% last year, compared -8% last year. The non-GAAP operating margin was – 3%, compared 2% last year.

On the company’s earnings call, Harshman described the three primary elements of the company’s strategy to enhance shareholder value:

  • the company’s previously announced strategic growth plan, which includes investments in new technologies (including CCAP, HEVC encoding, 4K, and multi-platform content delivery); and a significant expansion of the company’s global customer base

 

 

  • the continuing evolution of the company’s board of directors

 

Harmonic ended the quarter with 1,096 employees, up from 1,081 at the end of the previous quarter, and $228.3m in cash, up $27.1 million from the previous quarter.

The company’s current cash position and stated intention to repurchase up to $100m of its stock prompted Cortina Asset Management analyst Andrew Storm to ask Harshman if this means that Harmonic has “effectively put M&A off the table for the next couple of years.”

Harshman responded by saying “I think our position on M&A hasn’t changed. But we have not said that it’s definitively off the table, and I think that position hasn’t changed. That being said, we see ample opportunity the technology we have under the roof and the opportunity we have to bring that technology to market, our focus has been and continues to be very much on the organic development of our market — the organic pursuit of these opportunities.”

Storm followed up by asking if Harmonic would do a large M&A deal in the next year or two. Harshman responded saying “I don’t anticipate that we would, and we have had not anticipated that for some time.”

 

Guidance:

Aver said that Harmonic entered the quarter with the highest percentage of backlog in deferred revenue to revenue in the company’s history, and that the company is currently working on several large projects that won’t be recognized until the latter half of this year.

“Therefore, we expect to see our revenue build over the year and our Q2 revenue to be in the range of $105m to $115m in the second quarter of 2013. Non-GAAP gross margins for the second quarter are expected to be in the range of 51.5% to 52.5%, and we have targeted our non-GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter to be $54m to $55m.

.

“Harmonic continues to execute on our organic growth strategy and shareholder value initiatives,” said  Harshman. “During the quarter, we saw year-over-year growth in orders from international customers and domestic broadcast and media customers – both verticals core to our strategic growth plan. Although demand from domestic pay TV service providers remained soft during the quarter, many domestic customers are beginning to look ahead to new video infrastructure investments in emerging CCAP, HEVC, and Ultra HD technologies. Harmonic is making good progress in our efforts to establish a market-leading position in these new technology areas, as evidenced by our recent product announcements and positive customer feedback. In addition, with a strong balance sheet and continuing prospects for positive cash flow, we announced yesterday a tender offer for up to $100 million of our common stock as part of our ongoing commitment to create shareholder value.”

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Harmonic Announces First Quarter 2013 Results

Harmonic Q1 2013 Earnings Call Presentation

Broadcast Vendor M&A: Harmonic Divests Low Margin Cable Access Business to Aurora Networks for $46 Million

Previous Quarter: Harmonic Announces Q4 and Full Year 2012 Results

Previous Year: Harmonic Q1 2012: Weakness in Europe Results in 4% Revenue Decline

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Activist Investor Targets Harmonic

Broadcast technology vendor financials | Posted by Joe Zaller
Apr 25 2013

Harmonic disclosed that it received notice on Friday, April 19, 2013, from Voce Catalyst Partners LP that Voce intends to nominate three directors for election to Harmonic`s Board of Directors at the Company`s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

According to Harmonic, Voce and its affiliates report owning 106,000 Harmonic shares, representing less than 0.1% of the company`s shares outstanding.

Harmonic said in a statement that it will continue to evaluate the structure of its board of directors, and will “evaluate Voce`s nominees and make a recommendation in the best interests of all shareholders in due course.”

On the company’s Q1 2013 earnings call with analysts, Harmonic CEO Patrick Harshman said the company has not yet filed response letter to Voce, and added “we’re always interested in a dialogue with our shareholders, big, small, and frankly, prospective shareholders, and we continue to talk to anyone who’s got interesting ideas, and we’ll continue that stance.”

Harshman said his last conversation with Voce was “sometime within the last month” and that the company’s recently announced board transition and $100m share buyback program was not related to the approach from Voce.

.

.

Related Content:

Harmonic Announces $100 Million Stock Buyback, New Chairman

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

 

.

Harmonic Announces $100 Million Stock Buyback, New Chairman

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Apr 25 2013

Harmonic announced that it will buy back up to $100m of its shares a through a modified “Dutch Auction” tender at a price per share not less than $5.75 and not greater than $6.25. The tender offer is expected to commence on April 26, 2013, and to expire on May 24, 2013, unless extended. The number of shares proposed to be purchased in the tender offer represents approximately 14.1% of Harmonic’s currently outstanding common stock.

On the terms and subject to the conditions of the tender offer, Harmonic’s stockholders will have the opportunity to tender some or all of their shares at a price within the $5.75 to $6.25 per share range. Based on the number of shares tendered and the prices specified by the tendering stockholders, Harmonic will determine the lowest per-share price within the range that will enable it to purchase 16 million shares, or such lesser number of shares that are tendered and not withdrawn. All shares accepted in the tender offer will be purchased at the same price per share even if a stockholder tendered at a lower price. If stockholders tender more than 16 million shares at or below the purchase price per share, Harmonic will purchase the shares tendered at or below the determined purchase price by those stockholders, subject to proration and certain other factors.

“The tender offer is the result of the Board`s continued evaluation of our capital structure, the appropriate level of cash to run and grow the business, and our free cash flow and balance sheet,” said Patrick Harshman, Harmonic`s President and Chief Executive Officer. “With these resources, we have multiple opportunities to drive shareholder value, including investments in strategic growth initiatives and stock repurchases. As the Board continues to evaluate our capital structure and explore ways to effectively use our cash balances to drive shareholder value – and having solicited the input of several major shareholders – the Board concluded that a cash tender offer at this time would be an appropriate mechanism to return capital to shareholders that seek liquidity under current market conditions. At the same time, shareholders who do not participate in the tender offer will share in a higher portion of Harmonic`s future potential.”

Harmonic also announced that Patrick Gallagher was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors. Gallagher succeeds Lewis Solomon, who will retire from the Board prior to the Company`s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

“On behalf of the entire Board, I would like to thank Lew Solomon for his ten years of service to Harmonic and its shareholders, including the last five as Chairman,” said Gallagher. “He joined the Board at a time when Harmonic had just begun to expand beyond its roots in broadcast hardware and helped guide the Company in its evolution as a technology innovation leader. I look forward to working with our Board and management team as we continue to pursue the significant growth opportunities that we have before us today to create long-term value for our shareholders.”

The company said that the actions were designed to deliver value to its shareholders.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Harmonic Announces Intent to Repurchase Up to $100 Million of Its Common Stock Through A Modified “Dutch Auction” Tender Offer

Press Release: Harmonic Announces Capital Allocation and Board Changes

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

 

Video Chip Maker Ambarella Grows Revenue 24.5 Percent in Fiscal 2013

Broadcaster Financial Results, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 17 2013

Video chip maker Ambarella announced that its revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 was $31.5m, up 28.3% from $24.6 million in the same period in fiscal 2012. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013, the company’s revenue was $121.1m, up 24.5% from $97.3m for the year ending January 31, 2012.

GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 was $3.6m, or $0.13 per diluted ordinary share, compared with GAAP net income of $1.8m million, or $0.04 per diluted ordinary share, for the same period in fiscal 2012. GAAP net income for the year ended January 31, 2013 was $18.2m, or $0.60 per diluted ordinary share. This compares to GAAP net income of $9.8m, or $0.30 per diluted ordinary share, for the year ended January 31, 2012.

Q4 non-GAAP net income was $5m, or $0.18 per diluted ordinary share. This compares with non-GAAP net income of $2.7m, or $0.08 per diluted ordinary share for the same period in fiscal 2012. Non-GAAP net income for the year ended January 31, 2013 was $22.7m, or $0.79 per diluted ordinary share. This compares to non-GAAP net income of $13.1m, or $0.45 per diluted ordinary share, for the year ended January 31, 2012.

Q4 GAAP gross margins were 63.2%, down from 68.2% for the same period in fiscal 2012. For the year ended January 31, 2013, GAAP gross margin was 66.6%, flat with last year. Q4 non-GAAP gross margins were 63.3%, compared with 68.3% for the same period last year. Full year non-GAAP gross margin were 66.7%, down slightly from 66.7% versus last year.

“We are very pleased with our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2013 financial results,” said Fermi Wang, president and CEO. “We experienced significant year-over-year growth in our automotive and sports camera markets, and we were especially pleased with progress in our professional IP security camera market, which contributed strong gross margins as well as substantial year-over-year revenue growth. As this security market continues to grow rapidly, driven by the migration from analog standard definition cameras to digital, IP-based high definition cameras, we believe our products offer advanced technology and leading features that allow our customers to deliver winning solutions to the market.”

Ambarella’s A6 broadcast encoder/transcoder, which performs 1080p60 encoding and 1080i60 transcoding,is used by a variety of firms for H.264 and MPEG-2 head-end encoders and high-density transcoders.   It is believed that Ambarella’s broadcast industry clients include Harmonic, Ericsson, Motorola, Cisco, Harris, RGB Networks, and Evertz.

The company also sells video processors for digital video cameras, including the popular GoPro consumer cameras.

.

.

Relate Content:

Press Release: Ambarella, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2013 Financial Results

Ambarella Q4 FY 2013 Conference Call Transcript

Video Processing Chip Vendor Ambarella Raises $36 Million Through Initial Public Offering

Ambarella — Ammended S1 (IPO) Filing

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Harmonic Moves Transcoding Technology to the Cloud, Launches AWS-Based Service

broadcast industry technology trends | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 05 2013

Harmonic announced a cloud-based transcoding service for professional applications that it says will enable “content creators, service providers, and media professionals to quickly and cost-effectively convert broadcast-quality video content to virtually any standard media format.”

Dubbed ProMedia Carbon MP, Harmonic’s transcoding services runs on Amazon Web Services (AWS), and allows users to buy processing in hourly blocks, or via a monthly subscription.  Users can also access it via XML APIs to deploy scalable, cloud-based transcoding workflows.

Features and functionality includes a wide variety of image processing operations including transcoding, SD/HD conversion, PAL/NTSC conversion, logo insertion, color space conversion, color correction, and multi-format closed-captioning.  The company also says ProMedia Carbon MP supports the industry`s broadest array of acquisition, nonlinear editing, broadcast, web, and mobile formats including MXF, XDCAM® HD, QuickTime®, CableLabs®, and MP4.

Harmonic is the latest company to jump into the cloud-based transcoding world.

Earlier this year, Amazon launched the “Amazon Elastic Transcoder,” and last year at IBC Brightcove launched a cloud-based transcoding service using technology acquired in its $30m acquisition of Zencoder.

Transcoding is clearly a hot space, and the cloud-based transcoding services space just got a bit more crowded with Harmonic’s announcement.

As broadcasters and media companies scramble to deploy multi-screen services, transcoding is seen by many as a key technology.  As a result, transcoding has also attracted its fair share of financing and M&A activity.  Here’s a quick run-down of some of the recent transcoding deals and related-financial news:

 

 

  • In January 2013, Amazon unveiled its “Amazon Elastic Transcoder.” Based on the company’s Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform, the Elastic Transcoder the service provides “a highly scalable, easy to use and a cost effective way for developers and businesses to transcode video files from their source format into versions that will playback on devices like smartphones, tablets and PCs.”

 

  • In August 2012 Brightcove bought Zencoder, a 2-year old start-up with $2m in revenue for $30m, and subsequently launched a cloud based transcoding service at IBC 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • RGB Networks bought transcoding vendor Ripcode in 2010

 

 

Related Content:

Press Release: Harmonic Launches Cloud-Based Professional Video Transcoding Service

Harmonic Blog: Cloud Transcoding with Harmonic’s ProMedia Carbon MP – includes additional resources

Harmonic ProMedia Carbon MP Site on AWS Marketplace

Elemental Technologies Says Revenue Doubled in 2012 to $21 Million as Transcoding Technology Continues to Grow

Amazon Launches Scalable Cloud-Based “Elastic Transcoder” Service – A Potential Disruptor in a “Hot” Technology Space

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Brightcove Buys Zencoder for $30 Million in Latest Video Transcoding Deal

More Broadcast vendor M&A: Wohler Buys RadiantGrid, Latest in Series of Transcoding Deals

Envivio Files for $85 Million Goldman Sachs Led IPO

Envivio Closes $16.5 Million Fundraising Round

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Private Equity Firm Acquires Telestream

More Broadcast Vendor M&A — Telestream Purchase of Anystream Now Official

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Cisco to Buy Inlet Technologies for $95m

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Broadcast Vendor M&A: Harmonic Divests Low Margin Cable Access Business to Aurora Networks for $46 Million

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Feb 19 2013

Harmonic announced today it has reached an agreement to sell its cable access business to Aurora Networks $46m in cash.  The deal is expected to close by the end of the first quarter of 2013.

The company said it expects to net approximately $35m from the transaction after tax.  All proceeds from the sale will be used to repurchase shares, in support of the company’s ongoing efforts to review its capital structure and to deliver value to all its stockholders,

Cable access products, which includes optical transmitters, amplifiers, receivers and nodes, generated $52.9m in sales for Harmonic in 2012, approximately 10 percent of the company’s overall revenue $530.5m in 2012.

However the gross margins for the cable access product portfolio was only 30% in 2012, compared to GAAP gross margins of 49% for the Harmonic’s business as a whole in 2012.

Harmonic admits that it is “not a leader in the cable access product area”, and that there is “limited strategic synergy between cable access and the company`s other higher growth product lines.” The company says that its decision to divest its cable access business “reflects its commitment to the video production and playout, video processing, and cable edge product areas, where it currently holds market share leadership.”

“The sale of the Cable Access business enables us to sharpen our focus on our largest growth opportunities,” said Harmonic CEO Patrick Harshman. “Cable Access was Harmonic`s lowest margin product line, and through this transaction and the increase in our authorized share repurchase program, we will continue to drive growth in our core markets, expand our gross margin, reduce our outstanding shares, and position our business for stronger long-term earnings.”

 

Revised Guidance:

The company has issued revised financial guidance as a result of the sale of its cable access product line.

Harmonic says it now expects net revenue in the first quarter of 2013 to be in the range of $100m to $110m, down from $115m to $125m.  Gross margins for the first quarter of 2013 are now expected to be in the range of 51.5% to 52.5%, up from the 49% to 50% guidance issued previously.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Harmonic to Sell Cable Access Business to Aurora Networks for $46 million

Harmonic Cable Access Divestiture Investor Presentation

Harmonic Announces Q4 and Full Year 2012 Results

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

 

Harmonic Revenue Dips 2 Percent in Q3 2012

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Oct 24 2012

Harmonic announced that its revenue for the third quarter of 2012 was $136.7m, down 2% versus the same period a year ago, and up 3% versus the previous quarter.

The GAAP net loss for the quarter was $8.2m, or $(0.07) per share, compared with a GAAP net income $3.5m or $0.03 per share last year, and GAAP net income of $17,000, or $0.00 per share last quarter.

Non-GAAP net income for the third quarter was $8.1m or $0.07 per share, versus non-GAAP net income of $12.7m, or $0.11 per share last year, and non-GAAP net income of $7.2m or $0.06 per share last quarter

The results were in-line with the company’s previously issued guidance of revenue in the range of $130m to $140m, and also in-line with the consensus expectations of equity analysts.

On a GAAP basis, gross margins and operating margins for the quarter were 44% and -1%, compared to 46% and 3%, respectively, for the same period of 2011, and 43% and -2% respectively last quarter.

Non-GAAP gross margins and operating margins for the quarter were 48% and 8%, versus 51% and 12%, respectively last year, and 48% and 7%, respectively last quarter.

Company CFO Carolyn Aver attributed the decrease in gross margins to product mix in the quarter, as well as shift of revenue to emerging markets where ASPs are lower.

 

On a product-line basis:

  • Video processing represented 37% of total revenue versus 41% last year, and 45% last quarter

 

  • Production and playout (Omneon) represented 17% of total revenue versus 19% last year and 16% last quarter

 

  • Edge and access revenue represented 29% of total revenue versus 28% last year and 25% last quarter.

 

  • Services represented 17% of total revenue, versus 12% last year and 14% last quarter.  This represents record service revenue for the company.  Aver said that service revenue grew 20% from the second quarter and 35% from last year’s third quarter. “Services in general and professional services specifically have been an area of focus for us. This quarter’s revenue represents the successful completion of several projects. I do expect that service revenue will decrease slightly in Q4,” she said.

 

.

On a segment basis,

  • Cable was 50% of revenue, versus 45% last year and 48% last quarter.  The company said that demand from cable operators was particularly strong for its edge & products, and it believes it is gain market share in this area

 

  • Satellite & telco accounted was 20% of revenue versus 25% last year and 21% last quarter

 

  • Broadcast and media was 3o% of revenue, versus 30% last year, and 31% last quarter

 

Although the company did say it had won some multi-screen deals in the quarter, Harmonic CEP Patrick Harshman said that “customers are generally still struggling to find the right business model necessary to justify volume investments in multi-screen and over the top capabilities.”

International sales accounted for 58% of revenue in the quarter versus 51% during the same period a year ago, and 54% last quarter. This company said the increase is primarily a result of strong growth in Asia-Pacific and some emerging market growth, offset in part by year-over-year declines in Europe.

Harshman said that Harmonic continues to see strong growth in US from cable and telco customers, but that demand from US satellite and media companies was down year-over-year.

Bookings in the quarter were approximately $128.7m, down 9% versus last year, and down 8% versus last quarter.  The company said that new orders from Europe were down over 15% year-over-year, but that it gained market share in Europe, in cable, edge & access, and in multi-screen. Order growth in Asia and other emerging markets was “solid.”

Total backlog and deferred revenue was $137.7m at the end of the quarter, up 10% versus last year, and down 6% versus the previous quarter when it was an all-time high for the company.

  

Guidance:

Harmonic anticipates net revenue in the range of $132 million to $142 million for the fourth quarter of 2012. GAAP gross margins and operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to be in the range of 44% to 46% and $60 million to $61.5 million, respectively. Non-GAAP gross margins and operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2012, which will exclude stock-based compensation and the amortization of intangibles, are anticipated to be in the range of 48% to 50% and $55 million to $56.5 million, respectively.

 

“Harmonic delivered sequential revenue and earnings growth, and more than $20 million of cash from operations, in what continues to be a challenging economic environment,” said Harshman. “Our competitive position remains strong, and we believe we gained market share in both domestic and international markets. We also made significant progress on new product developments that position Harmonic to capitalize on the next wave of investment by our customers, including cable access (CCAP), high efficiency video coding (HEVC) for next-generation Internet-delivered and Ultra HD video, and a further strengthened solution portfolio enabling multiscreen video services.”

 .

.

Related Content:

Press release: Harmonic Announces Third Quarter 2012 Results

Harmonic Q3 2012 Earnings Call Presentation

Harmonic Q3 2012 Conference Call Transcript

Previous Quarter: Euro Weakness Offsets Strength in US for Harmonic in Q2 2012

Previous Year: Harmonic Reports Strong Q3 2011 Results, Driven by Strong Performance in Americas

 

© Devoncroft Partners.  All Rights Reserved

 

.

 

Video Processing Chip Vendor Ambarella Raises $36 Million Through Initial Public Offering

Broadcast technology vendor financials, IPO, SEC Filings | Posted by Joe Zaller
Oct 22 2012

Video chip maker Ambarella raised $36m through an initial public offering.  The company’s shares were priced at $6, well below the previously estimated range of $9 to $11.

About 4.9 million of the shares in the offering were sold by the company, with the rest coming from existing shareholders.  The company says the offering will net it approximately $24.9m, after expenses, and could rise to approximately $29.9m, if its underwriters fully exercise their over-allotment option.

The company said it intend to use the proceeds from the IPO for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. The company also said it may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire complementary businesses, products or technologies, but said it is not currently contemplating any such acquisitions.

Ambarella has two primary segments, “camera” and “infrastructure” (which includes broadcast-related customers), and has shipped approximately 27 million SoCs shipped since it was founded in 2004.

Last year Ambarella year, the company posted a profit of $9.8m on revenue of $97.2m, with approximately $24m coming from its infrastructure segment, which includes broadcast related applications.   For the first six months of 2012, the company posted a net profit of $7.8m on revenue of $53.9m, including $15m from the infrastructure segment.

The company says its A6 broadcast encoder/transcoder, which performs 1080p60 encoding and 1080i60 transcoding, is well-suited for high-density applications such as H.264 and MPEG-2 head-end encoders and high-density transcoders.   It is believed that Ambarella’s broadcast industry clients include Harmonic, Ericsson, Motorola, Cisco, Harris, RGB Networks, and Evertz.

The company also sells video processors for digital video cameras, including the popular GoPro consumer cameras.

The company is listed on the NSADAQ market, and trades under the ticker symbol AMBA.

.

.

Related Content:

Ambarella Amended S1 (IPO) Filing with the SEC

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Impressions of IBC 2012: M&A, Cloud, Multi-Platform, 4K, Efficient Operations, CiaB, and the “Return of Grass Valley”

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, content delivery, market research, technology trends | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 20 2012

A previous version of this article appeared in the “Tech Thursday” Spotlight Section of TVNewsCheck

.

Against the backdrop of the ongoing European debt crisis and the afterglow of the 2012 Olympics, nearly 51,000 visitors made their way to Amsterdam for the annual IBC trade show. Major themes of the five-day broadcast technology jamboree included vendor consolidation, buzz about new technologies for multi-screen content delivery and social TV, futuristic technology demonstrations, and several important new product introductions.

The broadcast vendor community got a little less fragmented on the first morning of IBC, with a merger announcement by two Norway-based video transport technology providers — Nevion and T-VIPS

Although no additional deals were unveiled at the show, vendor consolidation was one of the most discussed themes at IBC, and according to statements made by some of the leading vendors, there is potentially a lot more consolidation on the way.   

Newly acquired Miranda technologies made its debut as a “Belden brand” at IBC, and Belden EVP Denis Suggs was on hand at the show to meet customers and explain his company’s vision for the broadcast industry, and why they decided to buy Miranda in one of the largest broadcast technology M&A deals in recent years. 

In a nutshell, Belden saw the opportunity to acquire a cash-generating company with a top-class management team that’s growing faster than the overall market and jumped at it. Including Miranda, Belden now generates approximately $450 million a year in broadcast-related revenue, making it one of the industry’s largest players, and it appears they are not done doing deals in this space. 

Suggs said Belden views Miranda as a platform from which is can further expand its broadcast industry operations, and that it intends to support Miranda’s existing plan for further acquisitions.

Grass Valley CEO Alain Andreoli echoed a similar sentiment at his company’s press conference. He said that Francisco Partners, the private equity firm that owns Grass Valley, has a $3 billion fund behind it and will support Grass Valley’s efforts to become an industry consolidators.

When the dust settles, he said, Grass Valley may not be the largest player, but it will certainly be in the top three. Last year, Grass Valley bought PubliTronic, a provider of channel-in-a-box (CiaB) technology, to gain a larger foothold in the playout market. Expect to see Grass Valley and other players making additional strategic moves that help them enter attractive new market spaces.

But most IBC M&A talk centered on Harris Broadcast, which is currently being divested by its parent company. Although rumors were flying at the show about who might buy the division, its executives were tight-lipped. Harris Broadcast President Harris Morris would only say that the deal is progressing according to plan, and is on track to be completed as soon as the end of 2012.

New products and services based on cloud technology, multi-platform content delivery and social TV services dominated many demonstration and hallway conversations at IBC, particularly in the “Connected World” pavilion, where dozens of new and established firms displayed a host of products aimed at securing a place in this emerging ecosystem.

Despite the enthusiasm of vendors, many buyers publicly and privately expressed caution about the technology.

Critics of cloud technology cited immature technology, bandwidth limitations, security, and an unproven business case as barriers to its adoption. Likewise, broadcasters and content owners expressed concern over the “disconnect” between the desire of end-users to receive and consume video content on an ever-increasing number personal devices, and the ability of broadcasters to create sustainable and profitable multi-platform business models.

Cloud-based discussions at IBC ranged from real-world case studies of how EVS helped broadcasters set up private clouds to facilitate remote production of the Euro 2012 soccer championships and London Olympics, to practical solutions from Signiant and Aspera for managing the delivery of file-based content over IP-enabled and cloud-based infrastructure, to new solutions for cloud-based video production.

Cloud-based production is an emerging trend, but initiatives such as the ‘Adobe Anywhere’ initiative will prove to be a catalyst in this area. Taking cloud-based production to the “next level” are new firms like VC-backed start-up A-Frame, which is building from the ground-up a complete cloud-based video production environment that marries the experience of broadcast and post-production experts with forward-thinking IT-based software experts. 

On the multi-screen front, Ericsson introduced its first encoder based on HEVC/H.265 compression technology. The company says that its HEVC implementation offers the potential for users to reduce bandwidth by up to 50%, thereby enabling more efficient delivery of content over multiple platforms, including mobile networks.

Harmonic unveiled a new version of its ProMedia transcoder, aimed at enabling its customers to deliver an integrated multi-screen experience to their subscribers. Harmonic also introduced new members of its senior management team: CMO Peter Alexander, and CTO Krish Padmanabhan, who recently joined the company from Cisco and NetApp, respectively.

Noticeable by their absence on the Harmonic booth at IBC were the familiar Omneon and Rhozet brand names, which have now been absorbed into Harmonic. “Harmonic is a branded house, not a house of brands, and our singular focus is delivering excellent video quality to consumers everywhere,” said Alexander.

The Sony/SES Astra demonstration of live delivery of 4K images over satellite drew a lot of attention.

For many years, 4K images have been trade show “eye candy” for visitors, but at IBC 2012 Sony and SES showed that technology exists today to transmit high quality 4K images over satellite at a manageable 50mbit/s using h.264 compression technology.  The stunning live video images were delivered via an SES satellite to an 84-inch Sony Bravia 4K display.

The demo prompted speculation that 4K will be the “next HD” in terms of consumer adoption and broadcast infrastructure upgrades. Other observers took a more practical approach, saying that the industry might see 4K being used as a high-end production format in near to mid term, but that it will be a long time before broadcasters who have already spent millions on the transition to HDTV decide to upgrade again to 4K.

Indeed, when it comes to broadcast infrastructure upgrades it is operational efficiency, not higher resolution, which appears to be the primary demand of broadcasters. Thus, many vendors at IBC were promoting solutions designed to help broadcasters transition their operations to file-based and IT-oriented workflows. 

One of the ongoing initiatives in this area has been the development by a large number of vendors of integrated IT-based playout technologies, more commonly known as channel-in-a-box (CiaB).  These systems offer the promise of increased operational efficiency and significant cost savings through the integration of previously disparate playout and master control functionality into a single IT-based platform. Over the past several years, major vendors including Grass Valley, Miranda, Snell, Harmonic, and Evertz have offered products.

At IBC 2012, Harris became the latest entrant into the market with the launch of Versio, a CiaB system based on several of the company’s existing technology platforms including the Nexio server family, ADC automation, and Inscriber graphics. 

When describing the new Versio product at the company IBC press conference, Harris Morris said the No. 1 requirement for automated IT-based playout systems is reliability, and that this is an area where Harris Broadcast excels. Morris also emphasized that CiaB platforms rely heavily on automation technology, where Harris Broadcast is an established leader, making the company a natural choice for broadcasters considering integrated IT-based playout.

Although Harris Broadcast touted the fact that their Versio platform is based on the company’s existing technology platforms, it stopped well short of saying that the new system is a direct replacement for its current products, particularly its popular Nexio server family.

Instead the company described Versio as a robust cost-effective way for broadcasters to quickly add new services and digital subchannels channels, and to provide backup in emergencies.

“Channel-in-a-box should be about opening up new possibilities rather than limiting how a broadcaster can operate across multiple on-air scenarios,” said Andrew Warman, senior product manager at Harris Broadcast. “It’s limiting to look at channel-in-a-box as a system replacement for servers, automation, and other play-to-air systems. Broadcasters need freedom to build appropriate workflows for their operations, including external components.”

However, other vendors clearly see the CiaB market differently, and have taken a very different approach than Harris Broadcast, especially those firms that do not have an existing playout server business to protect. 

Snell Chief Architect Neil Maycock said that his company’s ICE platform is not only “ready for prime-time,” it is on the air today delivering high value content for major broadcasters.  Maycock also said that ICE has a unique architecture that enables it to scale from a single channel implementation, through a multi-location centralcasting model, to a large multi-channel playout environment.

PlayBox CEO Vassil Lefterov said he has built his entire business on disrupting the traditional server-based playout market. “We believe our singular focus on this application is a key advantage,” he said.  “Playbox has thousands of live channels on the air today and is working to re-define playout operations for many of our customers.”

Grass Valley, which like Harris has a significant video server business, took a more pragmatic approach.  SVP and CMO Graham Sharp said that “it’s likely CiaB and other IT-based playout systems may ultimately impact everyone’s server business, so we’ve taken the decision to cannibalize our own products where necessary by embracing IT technology, because if we don’t do it to ourselves someone else will.” 

Grass Valley was among the vendors with significant new products. Introductions included a new LDX camera platform that scales from a basic model to a high-end super-slow motion system; a new video server family, and brand new electronics for the Kayenne and Karrera production switchers.  Grass Valley said all its new products feature native 1080p processing, and provide straightforward upgrades via software.

Grass Valley also made bold claims about its future product plans, stating that by 2014 it will have replaced its entire portfolio with all new 1080p, IT-focused products. 

GV’s Sharp also hinted at a major NAB 2013 announcement from Grass Valley: “Next year we will introduce a completely new integrated IP-based platform that is totally format agnostic.” he said.  “We believe this new platform will enable a new way of working that we call non-linear production….”

All Grass Valley products, including those launched at IBC 2012, will be compatible with the new architecture, he said.

Sharp concluded GV press conference by saying: “If there is one take-away from this presentation about Grass Valley, it’s this: We’re back.”

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 3 – the 2012 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 28 2012

This is the sixth in a series of articles about some of the findings from the 2012 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2012 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry.

.

This is the third post in a series of articles about how broadcast technology vendors were ranked and benchmarked on a variety of metrics by the respondents to the 2012 BBS.

The first two posts in this series described the 2012 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, and the 2012 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table.  These rankings show how the global sample of 2012 BBS respondents rated a variety of broadcast technology vendor brands in terms of their overall opinion of these vendors, and also how their opinions have changed over time.

There were 48 vendors in the in the 2012 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, and 58 vendors in the 2012 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table.

However, the brands in the Overall Opinion and Net Change of Opinion rankings were not always the same. In fact, between these two sets of league tables, a total of 76 broadcast technology vendor brands were listed.

This post looks at looks at the companies that were listed in both the Overall Opinion and Net Change in Overall Opinion Rankings. In other words, these are the companies whose brands are held in high regard today, and who are perceived to be getting better over time.

We’ve called this list the 2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table. Out of the 76 broadcast technology vendor brands that were listed in the previous two rankings, just 30 brands (out of 152) were listed in both sets of rankings, either globally or regionally. These are shown below.

Please note that these results are shown in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked in the study. 

 


The 2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table:

 

Not only do 2012 BBS respondents hold these companies in high regard, their opinion of them has improved over the past several years.

There are a wide variety of companies on this list, including large and small firms; single product and multi-product firms; global and regional players; and audio and video technology providers.

What they have in common is strong brand recognition, and a dynamism that 2012 BBS respondents feel is making them even stronger.

 

Brand Opinion Leaders by Product Categories

As shown in the chart below, the companies in the 2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table make products in 25 of the 30 categories that we covered in the 2012 BBS.

The top products for brand leaders are Audio Processing and Monitoring, Graphics & Branding, Microphones, Signal Processing / Interfacing / Modular, Video Editing, and Video Transport.

 .

2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table — Frequency of Product Categories:

 

.

The chart above has a good mix of audio and video products, as well as a mix of hardware and software products.

It is also useful to look at the number of product categories provided by each vendor in the Global Brand Opinon Leader League Table.  After all, larger companies often make more products and are consequently used in more places than their smaller counterparts.

The table below shows the number of product categories that each brand in this ranking produces (as defined by the segmentation used in the 2012 BBS).

 

 

2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table — Number of 2012 BBS Product Categories per Brand:

 .

While there are several brands on this list that appear in many product categories, the vast majority produce only one or two types of products.  Indeed out of the thirty brands in this table, about hale 2/3 appear only once (down from 2/3 in 2011).

Keep in mind that companies who produce only one type of product are not necessarily small.  There are some very large companies on the list above who appear in just one 201 BBS category.

It turns out that to fully understand what drives brand opinion and brand leadership, one needs to look at the factors that drive and influence these perceptions.  This includes the company’s reputation for things like innovation, reliability, quality, value and great customer service.

These metrics will be covered in future posts.

 .

.

Please keep the following in mind when reviewing this information: All data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, not in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2012 BBS. All data in this article measures the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2012 BBS, regardless of organization type, organization size, job title, geographic location, or purchasing authority — responses based on individual organization types or geographic locations may be very different from the results shown in this article.  There is a minimum sample size requirement for any brand to be included in any cut of the data presented in this article. There were a total of 152 brands covered in the 2012 BBS, for a complete list please click here. Granular analysis of these results is available as part of various paid-for reports based on the 2012 BBS data set. For more information about this report, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

.

Devoncroft Partners has published a variety of reports from 2012 BBS data.  For more information, please get in touch.

.

.

Related Content:

The 2012 Big Broadcast Survey – Information and available reports

The 2012 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Trend Index

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2009 – 2012

Analyzing Where is Money Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2012 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 1 – The 2012 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 2 – The 2012 BBS Net Change of Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Last Year:  The 2011 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

 .

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.