Posts Tagged ‘Evertz’

The 2011 Big Broadcast Survey – Now Available

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, Broadcast technology channel strategy, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 10 2011

After many months of work, I am pleased to announce that the 2011 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) has been completed, and that reports from the study will be published soon.

If you’re not familiar with the BBS, it’s an annual demand-side study of the global broadcast industry. BBS reports help readers improve their strategic decision making, customer engagement, marketing strategy, product planning, and sales execution.

More than 8,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries participated in the 2011 BBS, making it by far the largest and most comprehensive market study of the broadcast industry.

Three types of reports are available:

  • The BBS Global Market Report is the broadcast industry’s first global demand-based study of the purchasing habits of technology buyers.  This report examines industry trends, major projects being planned, products being evaluated for purchase, current and future plant infrastructure and operational structure, broadcast technology budgets, and HD upgrade plans for a wide variety of products.

 

  • BBS Global Brand Reports are available for more than 100 broadcast technology vendors.  These reports provide deep insight into how each company is perceived by the market, along with comprehensive benchmarking of broadcast technology vendors on a wide variety of metrics, through a series of league table rankings

 

  • Twenty-six separate 2011 BBS Product Reports provide detailed vendor brand ranking for individual product categories. These reports enable users to benchmark their brand directly against specific competitors through a detailed understanding of the opinions of technology buyers who purchase, specify or use each product type.  

.

If you would like information about these reports and how they can help your business, please get in touch.

In addition to these paid-for reports, we will also be publishing highlights from the study on the Devoncroft website.  These articles will be posted on a semi-regular basis, so please check back often.   

You’ll also be seeing information from the 2011 BBS in a wide variety of other industry websites and trade magazines.

The tables below show the product categories and broadcast technology vendor brands covered in the 2011 BBS.

..

 Product Categories Covered in the 2011 BBS:

.

.

Broadcast Technology Brands Covered in the 2011 BBS:

.

.

 

Evertz Q3 Net Income Doubles as Revenue Rises 26 Percent

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 08 2011

Evertz Technologies reported that its revenue for the third quarter ended January 31, 2011, was C$83.2m, an increase of 26% versus the same period a year ago, and an increase of 1% versus the previous quarter.

The results were driven by a strong performance in the US and Canada, where revenue was C$48.5m, an increase of 44% versus the same quarter last year, and an increase of 20% versus the previous quarter.  The US and Canada accounted for 58% of the total revenue in the quarter.

International revenue for the quarter was C$34.7m, an increase of 7% versus the same quarter last year, but down sharply from C$42.8m in the previous quarter.  Company management said that Evertz experienced a “high level of quotation activity” in international markets, but implied that international sales had impacted by the recent unrest in the Middle East.

The company’s top 10 customers accounted for approximately 32% of revenue (C$26.6) during the quarter, with no one customer accounting for more than 9% (C$7.5m).  The company had fifty-seven order of more than C$200,000.

Net income for the quarter was C$23.6m, up 102% versus the same period a year ago, and up 13% versus last quarter.

Gross margins for the quarter were 57.5%, up from the 57% gross margins achieved in the same period a year ago, but down slightly from the previous quarter.  Evertz executive VP Brian Campbell said that although the company’s gross margins were impacted by competitive pricing pressure as well as volume discounts on large orders, they were within the company’s target range of 58%-62%.

Research & development cost for the quarter was C$9.6m, an increase of 21% versus the same period a year ago, and an increase of 17% versus the previous quarter.  On the company’s earnings call with equity analysts, Evertz CFO Anthony Gridley said the increase in R&D was due to recent acquisitions (including the purchase of Pharos) and a general increase in R&D headcount.  Evertz says it intends to continue to increase R&D investment.

SG&A for the quarter was C$10.2m, or was approximately 12% of revenue.

.

Year to Date

For the first nine months of the year the company’s sales were C$239.4m, an increase of 13% versus the same period a year ago.  Year-to-date revenue from the US and Canada was C$131.1m, an increase of 11% versus last year, while sales from the international region was C$108.3m, a 17% increase versus last year. Gross margins for the first nine months of the year were 57.8% versus 58.5% last year.  Year-to-date net income was C$65m, up 41% versus the first nine months of fiscal 2010.

.

New Server and Integrated Playout Products at NAB

Campbell said that Evertz expects there to be a lot of interest in it new server platform and Overture “channel-in-a-box” product at the NAB show in April.  He also said that visitors to the Evertz NAB booth would see the results of the integration of recently acquired technology from Pharos.

.

.

Related Content:

You can read the full Evertz Q3 FY 2011 earnings release here.

The Evertz Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) filing with Canadian regulators is here (Catchpa code required)

Information on Evertz’s previous quarter results are here.

Information on the acquisition of Pharos by Evertz is here.

.

.

Evertz Revenue and Earnings Decline in Fiscal Q3 2012 Despite Improving International Performance

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Mar 07 2011

Evertz announced that its revenue for the third quarter of its 2012 fiscal year was C$71.4m, a decline of 15% versus the same period a year ago, and up 1% versus the previous quarter.

The company’s top ten customers provided 27% of revenue during the quarter, with no one customer accounting for more than 6% (C$4.3m), and the company had 70 orders in excess of C$200,000.

Net earnings for the quarter were C$12.7m (C$0.17 per share), down 48% versus the same quarter last year.

The results for the quarter were below the expectations of equity analysts, who on average were looking for revenue of C$78.8m and EPS of C$0.24.

Revenue in the US/Canada region was C$32m, or 45% of total revenue, down 19% versus the same period a year ago, and down 11% versus the previous quarter.

International revenue was C$39.4m, an increase of 11% versus last year, and an increase of 14% versus last quarter.  When asked about the company’s international performance, Evertz EVP Brian Campbell attributed the growth to the increasing demand for the company’s products in international markets as a result of the ongoing worldwide transition to HDTV operations, the rebound in some international markets, and the fact that that Evertz had been able to “refocus its resources” where needed thanks to its flexible sales structure.

Gross margins in the quarter were 56.2%, down from 58% last year and down from 57.3% last quarter.  The company attributed the decline in gross margins to a different geographic and product mix in the quarter, particularly the lower sales performance in the US market where margins for some products are higher.

R&D expenses in the quarter were C$11m, an increase of 15% versus the same period last year.  On its conference call with equity analysts Evertz CFO Anthony Gridley attributed the rise in R&D spending to the timing of expenditure for prototyping materials, which increased during the quarter.  Gridley also said that the company will continue to increase its R&D investment, and that a run-rate of approximately C$11m per quarter should be considered normal.

SG&A expenses for the quarter were C$12.7m, an increase of 27% versus last year. Selling and administrative expenses represented approximately 17.7% of revenue in the quarter.

Capex was up sharply to C$10.9m, due primarily to the purchase of a new airplane for approximately C$9m during the quarter.  The company said it is in the process of retiring the existing airplane that it already owns.

.

Year to Date Performance:

Revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2012 was C$217m, down 10% versus last year.

Year-to-date US and Canada revenue was C$113.2m, down 14% versus the previous year.  Year-to-date revenue in the international region was C$103.9m, down 5% versus the previous year.

Gross margins for the first nine months of the year were 57%, down from 58% last year, but still within what the company’s targeted range.

 

Outlook:

The company said that it expect its revenue for the second half of the current half of the fiscal year to exceed the first half of the year, and that it should grow faster than the overall market over the next several years.

Campbell said that Evertz is entering the fourth quarter and the upconing NAB trade show with strong momentum.  The company’s purchase order backlog at the end of February 2012 was in excess of C$42m and shipments during the month of February 2012 C$26 million.  In the past the company typically turned its PO backlog into sales in 4-6 weeks, but Campbell said that more recently the conversion time between orders and sales had increased, and that some of the company’s current backlog will take longer to convert into sales.

 

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Evertz Technologies Reports Results for the Third Quarter Ended January 31, 2012

Previous Year: Evertz Q3 2010 Net Income Doubles as Revenue Rises 26 Percent

Previous Quarter Press Release: Evertz Technologies Reports Results for the Second Quarter Ended October 31, 2011

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

CES 2011 – Connected TV, Mobile DTV, 3D and Big Crowds

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jan 13 2011

Last week I was shocked back to post-holiday reality by my annual winter pilgrimage to Las Vegas for the 2011 CES exhibition.  I spent a couple of days in the conference session and walking the (very crowded) show floor.

As in 2010, some of the key themes at CES were making money (or not) from online content, connected TV, 3D TV, and mobile TV broadcasting.

The conference session I attended focused on connected TV, online TV and the monetization of content via these channels.  On the monetization point, I lost count of the number of times I heard the word “experimentation” during these sessions – particularly from content owners.  In other words, although everyone agrees that multi-platform content delivery is a very important trend, many players have still not figured out the business model.

Connected TV however is another story – it’s an area where the business model is a bit more straightforward.

A long time ago, I used to work in the interactive TV space, and this is what connected TV reminds me of… it’s an interactive EPG that just happens to point at web content and your media library in addition to the channels that you receive from your provider.  However there is one critical difference with today’s connected TV platforms versus the interactive TV technology of a decade ago – the ability to deliver target advertising to specific viewers. 

Although I look at connected TV as a fancy EPG that’s connected to a sophisticated ad serving platform, I think it’s where I think we’ll be seeing real innovation (and revenue) over the next few years.  To me the promise of connected TV is stronger than that of 3D, another hot topic at CES.

After all that 3D hype at the beginning of 2010, the hysteria over 3D seems to have cooled down a bit in 2011.  3D set sales are slow, there’s not much content out there, and on the professional side broadcast vendors have significantly toned down their statements about 3D, as evidenced by the IBC press conferences of companies such as Grass Valley and Harris.

Nevertheless, there was still a great deal of 3D at CES this year – particularly at Panasonic, which as you can see in the photo below dedicated a considerable portion of its CES booth to 3D technologies.

.

 

.

I am still a 3D skeptic, particularly in terms of its real impact on the professional market. Yes, there is some equipment being sold, and yes there are a few dedicated 3D channels out there… but in terms of the overall market 3D today is still a drop in the bucket.  Only time will tell if 3D ever really becomes mainstream.  Nevertheless the 3D hype goes on, albeit in a somewhat toned-down form.

Another technology platform on which many have pinned their hopes is mobile TV broadcasting.  US OTA broadcasters are fighting a battle on many fronts – from the government, to Gary Shapiro at the CEA, to the need to generate new revenue streams, to the need to remain relevant in a multi-channel, always-on media environment — and they see mobile DTV broadcasting as a key way to help them succeed on all fronts. 

 

.

At CES, there was a small group of booths that were showing off technologies for ATSC mobile DTV broadcasting.  US broadcasters are serious about mobile TV, and they were there in force along with some well established (Harris, LG) and new technology vendors.  Over the course of the show, I ran into broadcasters from most of the networks and major station groups.  There were also a large number of broadcast vendors in attendance with one (Evertz) even having a booth at the show.

From the conversations I had at CES, I expect mobile DTV broadcasting to be a major theme of the NAB show in April.  Given the political climate this could be the make or break year for mobile DTV broadcasting in the US.  It’s going to be interesting to watch.

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Evertz Buys Pharos, Adding Automation and Media Management Capabilities to New Playout Solutions

broadcast industry trends, Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jan 04 2011

When Evertz released their Q2 numbers last month, the earnings press release included a short paragraph that said:

Subsequent Event: The Company, on December 3, 2010, entered into an agreement to purchase the shares of an international technology based company for under $5 million.

When asked about this purchase by equity analysts on the earnings conference call, Evertz EVP Brian Campbell did not identify the acquired company by name, but said that it had revenue of around C$9m and was modestly profitable.  Campbell went on to say that the newly acquired company provides file-based workflow, automation and content management tools that will help Evertz accelerate its penetration of file-based markets, specifically those it will soon be addressing with its recently announced media server and channel-in-a-box products.  

I have now had it confirmed that the acquired company is UK-based Pharos.

There is good logic behind this deal, and it appears to make sense for both sides.  Evertz recently launched video server and channel-in-a-box products, but lacked the media management and automation systems required for comprehensive control.  Pharos had the right software tools, but lacked a hardware platform – a situation that was increasingly becoming an issue as their competitors consolidated and aligned through M&A (e.g. Miranda’s acquisition of OmniBus) and / or as automation vendors increasingly enter the playout business with their own hardware platforms (e.g. Snell’s Morpheus ICE and the Pebble Beach Dolphin system).

Pharos co-founder Spencer Rodd told me the two companies started talking at the 2010 IBC show about how to integrate Pharos’ automation and media management products with the new Evertz playout server and channel-in-a-box products.  The product integration went well and Rodd said that he was very impressed by what he saw at Evertz, especially its engineering ethos and ability to mobilize engineering teams and get projects done quickly.  Once the initial integration was completed, the two companies recognized that a deeper relationship made sense, and the deal was done.

Although Pharos has been acquired by Evertz, it will remain a stand-alone business unit and both Rodd and fellow co-founder Roger Heath are remaining with the company.

Rodd says that no layoffs are planned and that Pharos is currently hiring in order to expand its team and to penetrate new markets including North America.  This is clearly good news for Pharos, since the company was in danger of being stretched too thinly as it worked to deliver complex multi-site projects for customers world-wide.  The additional resources now available to the Pharos team will enable them to deliver projects more smoothly, and should also give customers the confidence to invest in Pharos technologies.

The deal is due to be announced tomorrow.

.

.

Evertz Reports 13% Increase in Q2 Revenue Driven by Strong International Sales. Announces Purchase of File-based Workflow Specialist.

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Dec 07 2010

Evertz Technologies reported that it earned C$20.9m during its second quarter on sales of C$82.3.  Sales were up 13% year over year, and up 12% versus the previous quarter.  According to a Reuters article, analysts were expecting revenue to come in around C$78.6m.

Without disclosing any specific names, Evertz said that its top ten customers accounted for around 35% of sales (C$28.8m) during the quarter, and that no customer accounted for more than 12% of revenue (C$9.9m).

International sales, which increased 42% versus the same period a year ago, were C$42.8m and accounted for 52% of total revenue.  This is the first time that more than 50% of the company’s revenue has come from the international market.  Meanwhile, sales in the US and Canada were down 8% versus the prior year quarter to C$40.4m.  

The company said that its backlog at the end of the November 2010 was more than C$30m, and that the geographic mix of these future sales was similar to its Q2 performance – so it appears that the its strong international performance will continue.

Gross margins were 57.9%, at the lower end of the company’s target range.  On the earnings conference call company management attributed the lower gross margins to product mix and increased pricing pressure, but said that they were not changing their gross margin targets.

For the first six months of the year the company’s sales were C$156.1m, an increase of 8% versus the first half of last year.  International sales were up 22% during the first six months of the year, while sales from the US and Canada were down 3%.  Gross margins for the first half of the year were 58%.

.

Acquires file-base specialist

In its earnings press release, the company said that it had “entered into an agreement to purchase the shares of an international technology based company for under $5 million.” 

When asked about this purchase by equity analysts on the conference call, Evertz EVP Brian Campbell did not identify the acquired company by name, but said that it had revenue of around C$9m and provides file-based workflow, automation and content management tools.  Campbell said that these new capabilities would help Evertz accelerate its penetration of file-based markets, specifically those it will soon be addressing with its recently announced media server and channel-in-a-box products.  Campbell told analysts that the company’s media server is a full system, encompassing ingest, playout and enterprise storage; and that the company expects to achieve “significant traction” in the market with this product.

When asked about the possibility of future M&A, Campbell said that because of its size and reach, Evertz is often approached by smaller companies who are looking for a bigger partner.  

.

You can read the full Evertz Q2 earnings release here.

Information about the company’s previous quarter results are here.

.

Value for Money Rankings of Broadcast Technology Vendors — The Top 30 Globally

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 27 2010

This is part of series of posts about the how the brands of broadcast technology vendors were ranked by respondents to the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS).

Each year as part of the Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global sample of broadcast professionals are asked to rank their opinion of a number of technology vendor brands on a wide range of metrics.  This information is used to create a series of reports, which through benchmarking and industry “league tables” enable these vendors to understand their competitive position in the market.

More than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participated in the 2010 BBS, making this the largest ever and most comprehensive study of the broadcast industry. In addition to measuring a variety of broadcast industry trends, more than 100 vendor brands (in 27 separate product categories) were evaluated by respondents.

.

Recently, posts which rank broadcast technology vendors include:

 . 

This post looks at how respondents ranked broadcast technology vendors for what is perhaps the most subjective driver we measured in the 2010 BBS — value for money.

.

For some respondents value for money might mean low price, for others it might mean superior price/performance, while for others it could mean peace of mind in mission critical environments, regardless of the price.

Whatever the definition of value, the combination of a poor economy over the past few years and customer budget constraints have made many broadcast professionals more value-conscious than ever.  As a result, broadcast technology vendors must respond by continually delivering more value for less money.  This drives innovation in the broadcast supply chain as vendors are forced to compete on multiple levels.

Respondents were asked to rank broadcast technology vendor brands for “Value for Money” on a scale of 1-10 — with 10 being best in the market, and 1 being worst in the market.  The top 30 ranked brands for overall opinion are shown below for the global sample of all respondents.

.

In all cases, these results are shown in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked by respondents to the survey. 

.

Value for Money – The Top 30 Globally, Alphabetical Order

.

There are a wide variety of vendors on this list, including large & small companies and those who produce audio & video products.  In order to better understand what drives the perception of value, we need to look at some of the factors behind these results.  These include the number of products produced by each vendor, the geographic location of the each vendor, and the types of product produced by the top 30 value companies.

 .

.

Number of products per vendor

When reviewing these results it’s important to understand how many products are produced by each vendor on this list.  This will help us to understand if whether reliability comes from small focused companies, or large multi-product vendors. 

The 2010 BBS evaluated 27 separate product categories.  In the previously published top 30 quality rankings, and top 30 reliability rankings, single product companies (those who were covered on only one product category in the 2010 BBS) completely dominated the rankings with about 2/3 of all positions.

A breakdown of how many product categories are produced by each vendor on the top 30 value list is shown below:

.

.

Just over half of the vendors in the top 30 value rankings produce a product in only one BBS category (out of 27 measured).  This is slightly less concentrated that other findings, such as reliability where there were 21 single product companies in the top 30.

In the case of value, there is a mix of large and small, and single and multi-product companies.  It’s worth pointing out here that much of this list is made up of the industry’s largest multi-product vendors.  For example Grass Valley (10 categories), Evertz and Miranda (5 categories each), Sony (4 categories), Ross Video (3 categories), Apple, Black Magic Design, Cisco, For-A, Harmonic, Ikegami, Panasonic, and JVC (2 categories each).

 .

.

Geographic Location

Another factor to consider is the geographic location of each company on the list.  By this measure, companies headquartered in the Americas are the clear value for money leaders, while companies based in the EMEA and Asia trail the pack. 

.

.

Keep in mind that when looking at geography, it’s important to remember that many of these firms are truly global, with offices all over the world, regardless of where they are headquartered.

.

.

Product Categories

Finally, let’s look at the product categories produced by the vendors who made the top 30 value list for the 2010 BBS.

.

.

Out of the 27 product categories covered in the 2010 BBS, 21 appear on this list. This is on par with other metrics. For comparison, there are 20 product categories in the top 30 reliability rankings and 23 product categories in the top 30 quality rankings.

Signal processing products lead the list of products produced by the top 30 value leaders.  This is a fiercely competitive market that is at the heart of the transition to HDTV operations, and customers look for both value and quality.  Cameras and audio consoles were close behind, while microphones, production switchers, routing switchers and video transport also made a strong showing.

 .

Please keep in mind when reviewing this information that, unless otherwise specified, all data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, not in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2010 BBS.  Also, the charts in this posting measure the responses of all 2010 BBS respondents, regardless of their company type, company size, geographic location, job title and budget for broadcast technology products.  

In order to get full value from this data, it is necessary to evaluate these results on a granular basis.  If you would like more information, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

.

.

.

This article is based on the findings from the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of industry trends, technology purchasing behavior and the opinion of vendor brands.  With more than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participating, the 2010 version of the BBS is the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.

Devoncroft Digest — July 30, 2010 – Earnings Season Continues, Grass Valley Finds a Buyer, More Broadcast Industry M&A, Harris Creates New Division, Elemental and Envivio Close Funding Rounds

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials, Devoncroft Digest, market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jul 30 2010

The Devoncroft Digest provides an overview of and insight into industry news items that I think might be interesting / important for readers and clients. 

Here are a few of the things that have caught my eye this week.

Earnings Season Continues

A number of broadcasters, TV platform operators and broadcast technology vendors announced their earnings this week. With one or two exceptions the results were generally positive.

.

 

Broadcast Technology Vendor Earnings

Harmonic posted strong Q2 results.  The company’s revenue was up 18% versus the same period last year, and up 13% versus the previous quarter.  More importantly, the company’s net income of the quarter was $4.4m vs. a loss of $7.9m during the same period last year.

On the company’s earnings conference call and slide presentation Harmonic executives also discussed the pending acquisition of video server company Omneon, and provided a bit more information on Omneon’s business.  Omneon recorded bookings of $57.8m during the first half of 2010, a 19% y/y increase.  For the full year, Omneon is expected to have revenues of $120-$125m, with (non-GAAP) gross margins of 57-57% and (non-GAAP) operating margins of 6-7%.

The market seemed to like what Harmonic had to say.  On the day after the earnings announcement, Harmonic shares were up by almost 17%.

.

Technicolor announced its results for the first half of 2010 this week, which saw revenues decline 18.5% versus the previous year.  The company achieved EBIT of €15m from “continuing operations,” but recorded an EBIT Loss of €109m from “discontinued operations.”  The company attributed this EBIT loss “mostly to Grass Valley,” which found a buyer this week after being for sale for more than a year (more on that below).  More information about Technicolor can be found in the slide presentation that the company used during its analyst earnings conference call. 

.

Belden issued strong numbers for Q2, beating the expectation of equity analysts.  Driven by strong results from the Americas (which were up 27% y/y), the company’s revenues rose 24% versus the same period a year ago, and 6% versus the previous quarter.    The company issued an upbeat forecast and raised its guidance for the future.

.

Audio (and now video) specialist Dolby Labs delivered strong results for its 3rd quarter.  The company’s revenues rose 34% versus the same period last year, and its net income increased by 25% versus Q3 2009.  Dolby which has been pushing aggressively into the 3D and Digital Cinema markets, recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $9.6 million in cost of revenue related to digital cinema systems provided under operating leases to exhibitors.

Separately, Dolby announced an additional $300m for its stock repurchase program, which has the objective of offsetting dilution from the company’s equity compensation programs.

.

Cable technology vendor ARRIS announced its preliminary Q2 Results.  The company’s revenues were up slightly, but its net income and gross margins were both down.  Investors were unhappy with these results and sent the company’s shares down sharply.

.

Leading set-top box vendor Pace announced strong results for the first half of 2010.  For the first six months of the year the company’s revenues rose by 21% and profit jumped by 46% versus the same period in 2009.  Separately, the company announced its intention to acquire 2Wire (see below).

.

.

Broadcaster & Platform Operator Earnings

European satellite operator Eutelsat announced this week that it achieved a record year, and that its revenue and EBITDA growth both exceeded 11% versus 2009.  The company’s earnings press release that it now delivers 3,662 broadcast TV Channels, and that the number of HDTV channels had grown by 80% during 2010.

.

Belo, one of the largest pure-play TV broadcasters in the US delivered strong results for its second quarter of 2010.  The company’s revenue for Q2 was up by 13% versus 2009, and its net income almost doubled.  Significantly the company’s revenue from the automobile sector was up by 51% and its digital (website) revenues grew by 14%. 

.

US cable operator Comcast reported that its revenues increased by 6.1% in its second quarter of 2010/  The company’s operating income and cash flow were both up, but it lost 256,000 basic video subscribers.  The company, which is currently seeking approval to purchase NBC-Universal, disclosed that it spent a total of $59m on the deal during the quarter

.

UK-based Virgin Media delivered strong results for its second quarter.  The company’s revenue, operating income and cash flow all increased. 

.

 .

Broadcast Industry M&A Continues

Multiple broadcast technology M&A deals were announced today:

  • Grass Valley is to be acquired by Francisco Partners, a private equity firm
  • Ross Video is buying Codan
  • Pace announced  proposed their acquisition of 2Wire

 

Francisco Partners has made a binding offer to buy 100% of the shares in Grass Valley

After more than a year on the block, and several rumored bids, Technicolor appears to have found a buyer for Grass Valley – a Private Equity firm called Francisco Partners.    According to Technicolor CFO Stephane Rougeot “This binding offer is a key step in the largest of the disposals we decided to make as part of the strategic refocus of our activity portfolio. This will clarify and solidify our financial profile. This is also positive news for Grass Valley Broadcast employees and customers who will benefit from the engagement of a new shareholder recognized as a leader in technology-based businesses.”

Francisco is buying all of Grass Valley, except for the transmission business, which is being retained by Technicolor.

Technicolor certainly did not get rich from this deal.  It paid $172m for Grass Valley in 2002, and then acquiring multiple companies (including Canopus for more than $100m) over the past few years, the company has now struck a deal with Francisco Partners which according to a Technicolor press release values Grass Valley at $100m.

After reviewing the structure of the deal, one industry insider told me that Grass Valley was sold at what one industry insider described to me a “fire sale.”  In fact it appears that no money will change hands, and that Technicolor will actually pay €20m to Grass Valley in order to fund “ongoing management of the activity.”

For its part, Francisco Partners will sign an $80m IOU, which carries capitalized interest of 5% per year.  This means that Francisco will not pay anything for Grass Valley for at least five years, and that Technicolor will make a large cash injection into the company to keep it going. 

Clearly Technicolor wanted to get rid of Grass Valley and its associated losses so it can focus on its now core business activities.  The only silver lining for Technicolor is that it has the right to “receive additional consideration from the buyer based on the potential future remuneration of the new owners of the disposed entity.”

Grass Valley announced the deal in a press release and a letter to customers.    The company has set up a deal-oriented website where information about the transaction has been published, and has also created an “Ask Jeff.” (as in Jeff Rosica, head of the Grass Valley Broadcast & Professional business) email address where questions about the deal can be sent directly to the company. According to Rosica, who was interviewed by industry website TVNewsCheck, it’s Business As Usual At Grass Valley.

Grass Valley is one of the industry’s great companies and I am sure that the people there are happy to finally have resolved their fate.  Let’s hope they can now focus on making great products – and of course money for their new owners.

.

Ross Video Acquires Codan

Ross Video, which is best known for its production switchers and newsroom automation systems, announced that has it entered into a letter of intent to buy 100% of the shares of Codan Broadcast Products Pty Ltd. The sale, subject only to the finalization of due diligence, is scheduled for completion on 31 August, 2010.  The deal will expand the Ross portfolio by adding Codan’s product range of routing switchers, signal processing and audio monitoring.  It also strengthens Ross Video’s foothold in the important Australian broadcast market. This is the second Ross acquisition in the past two years. In 2009 Ross purchased Dutch graphics firm Media Refinery.  

.

Pace to Acquire 2Wire

Leading set-top box vendor Pace plc announced its proposed $475m acquisition of 2Wire, a provider of residential gateways and associated software for the broadband service provider market.  According to the press release, 2Wire has established customer relationships in the tier one telco market, including AT&T, which has been a customer of 2Wire for 10 years and uses 2Wire solutions in its U-Verse platform.  2Wire is currently owned by a consortium including Alcatel-Lucent, AT&T, Telmex, and Oak Investment Partners.

Pace says that following the completion of the acquisition it will be the number one provider of telco residential gateway devices in the US and the number three globally.

 .

.

3D News – RealD Insiders Cash in on IPO

The Wall Street Journal reports that following on from their successful IPO, insiders at 3D firm RealD Insiders Made More Money in IPO than Company Did.  A skeptical Wall Street equity analyst is quoted in the article as saying that the only reason for the IPO was to generate liquidity for investors.

 .

.

Other Broadcast Technology Vendor News

Harris Creates New Division, Names Means GM

The changes continue at the broadcast communications division of Harris.  The company announced this week that it has created a new “Workflow, Infrastructure & Networking” (WIN) business unit, and named newly hired Doug Means as its General Manager.  According to the company’s press release, Means will lead the newly formed WIN business unit, which encompasses the Harris Broadcast infrastructure, networking, server, automation and asset management product portfolios. WIN was formed as part of an overall strategy to create scale, reduce organizational complexity and deliver more interoperable solutions to address the continually changing needs of Harris Broadcast customers.

.

 Ross Video Appoints Nigel Spratling to Marketing Role

Production switcher specialist Ross Video has appointed industry veteran Nigel Spratling to a marketing role at the company.  Spratling was most recently the CEO of Echolab, which was forced to liquidate earlier this year when its primary shareholder pulled the plug.  The fate of Echolab is still undetermined, but I have been hearing rumours that Blackmagic Designs is set to announce that they have acquired the company’s assets. 

 

.

Evertz Lands Big International Order

Canadian infrastructure vendor Evertz, which prides itself on not doing marketing, took the unusual step of issuing a short press release to announce the fact that the company has received orders in excess of C$7m from an unnamed international customer.   

.

Elemental Closes $7.5m Funding Round

Video transcoding firm Elemental Technologies, which uses GPU processing announced that it has closed a $7.5 funding round, bringing the total VC money raised by Elemental to more than $14 million.  The round was led by Steamboat Ventures, with Voyager Capital and General Catalyst Partners also participating.  Interestingly, according to an SEC document filed by Elemental earlier this year,  the company had provisioned to raise up to $9m.  The company says it intends to use the capital to expand its business in the United States and internationally.   Transcoding is a tough business as evidenced by the recent sale of Ripcode (who had raised considerable financing) to RBG.  Perhaps Elemental’s unique GPU-based approach will enable the company to thrive – it gets pretty good reviews from broadcasters according to an article about Pitch Blue which appeared in Broadcasting & Cable magazine this week.

 .

Envivio Raises $15m

GigaOm property NewTeeVee reported this week that Envivio, another player in the video encoding / transcoding space,  has secured $15m in additional funding and shaken up its management team. 

.

 .

Other Platform Operator News

Ascent Media Hires 3 New VPs

Ascent Media has appointed three new vice-presidents for its media and digital services operations in Burbank, CA. 

.

.

MobileTV News

The Wall Street Journal published an interesting article about the state of the mobileTV marketin the USA, which discusses Qualcomm’s Plans for FLO TV, the US broadcaster-backed Open Mobile Video Coalition and mobileTV operator MobiTV.  The WSJ’s finding?  The picture for mobile TV in the US is “fuzzy.”

 .

.

Other News

Broadcasting & Cable magazine’s Glen Dickson wrote an interesting article about the new HD file delivery platformsthat are being rolled out by Ascent Media and DG FastChannel. 

According to B&C, Pitch Blue, the new HD file delivery platform from Ascent Media and CBS is now delivering HD content to 1,350 US TV stations, while the new system from DG FastChannel has been deployed in 500 US TV stations.  The B&C article also highlights the need for transcoding systems in TV stations to convert these HD file to house formats.  As mentioned above, Elemental gets a good review from stations.    

 .

.

Market Research Note of the Week: Reliability Rankings of Broadcast Technology Vendors — The Top 30 Globally

Broadcast technology products are purchased by discerning customers for what are often mission-critical applications. Thus, the reliability of products is a paramount concern for buyers of these products.

To measure the rankings of the reliability of vendors, respondents were asked to rank broadcast technology vendor brands for “reliability” on a 10-point scale, with 10 being best in the market and one being worst in the market. The top 30 ranked brands are shown in the graph for the global sample of all respondents. There are a wide variety of vendors on this list, including large and small companies and those who produce audio and video products.

When reviewing these results it’s important to understand how many products are produced by each vendor on this list. This will help us to understand if reliability comes from small, focused companies or large, multiproduct vendors.

The 2010 BBS evaluated 27 separate product categories. As with the previously published top 30 quality rankings, single-product companies (those who were covered on only one product category in the 2010 BBS) dominate the rankings for reliability.

To read the full article, including a breakdown and analysis of the findings, click here.

Evertz Reports Q4 and Full Year Results

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jun 17 2010

Last night, broadcast technology vendor Evertz released their Q4 and full year results.

You can read the company’s earnings press release here.

You can hear a replay of conference call by dialing +1.866.245.6755. Pass code: 130455.

The company delivered good results, which topped the expectations of equity analysts.

Here are a few highlights:

Revenue for Q4 was C$75.3m, down 3% versus the same period a year ago, but up 14% over the previous quarter.

In terms of geographic split, sales in Q4 from the US and Canada decreased by 28% versus the same period last year, but this was partially offset by a 41% y/y increase in international revenue (which Evertz defines as markets outside of the US and Canada).  International revenue rose by 23% versus the previous quarter, while sales in the US and Canada decreased by 28%.

Revenue for the full year was C$286.5, a 9% y/y decline. 

Annual revenue from the US and Canada declined 26% versus last year, while international revenue was up by 24% over last year.

The company’s gross margins slipped a bit to 58% (versus 61% last year).  On the earnings conference call, the company attributed this to pricing pressures and the cost of international expansion.

Overall, this was a strong performance from Evertz.  The company’s international growth is particularly notable. 

The growth in international sales confirms the findings from the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey, which found that both the top trend and top project in the European market is the transition to HDTV HD/3Gbps operations. 

The market in the US and Canada has slowed due to the recession and also because many of the top TV markets have already transitioned to HDTV operations.  Thus the spending on this type of equipment is shifting to Europe and Asia.  Traditionally these markets have not been strong for Evertz, but the company has clearly made international expansion a priority and despite the slightly lower gross margins, we are seeing the fruits of these efforts.  Indeed, international sales accounted for just over half of the company’s Q4 revenue and 46% of total revenue for the full year.

This of course make one wonder, is the European market getting larger, or is Evertz taking share away from entrenched incumbents?

The Top 30 Improving Vendor Brands in Broadcast Technology, Ranked Globally and Regionally

broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jun 07 2010

This is the second in a series of posts about the how the brands of broadcast technology vendors were ranked by respondents to the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS).

Each year as part of the Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global sample of broadcast professionals are asked to rank their opinion of a number of technology vendor brands on a wide range of metrics.  This information is used to create a series of reports, which through benchmarking and industry “league tables” enable these vendors to understand their competitive position in the market.

More than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participated in the 2010 BBS, making this the largest ever and most comprehensive study of the broadcast industry. In addition to measuring a variety of broadcast industry trends, more than 100 vendor brands (in 27 separate product categories) were evaluated by respondents.

Recently, I discussed how respondents to the 2010 BBS ranked The Top 30 Broadcast Technology Vendor Brands by Overall Opinion, Ranked, Globally and Regionally

Appearing in the top 30 of an overall opinion poll is obviously a good place for any vendor to be, but this only scratches the surface of how the market views a brand. 

While indicative of the market’s view, these overall opinion rankings are presented as a snapshot in time.  They also provide a somewhat one-sided view of how brands are regarded because they take only positive perceptions into account.  In order to get a better understanding of how broadcast technology vendor brands are perceived, it is necessary to look at both the positive and negative opinions of brands, and to take into account how these opinions have changed over time. 

One way to do this is to ask people who have an opinion of a brand, how their opinion of that brand has changed over time – i.e. has it improved, declined or stayed the same. 

When you do this, you can get some interesting results.  It turns out that some brands are more polarizing than others, with different respondents having very different opinions.  For example, here’s a chart from the 2009 Big Broadcast Survey. 

 

Notice that in the above table, the company that was ranked #1 for “got better” also ranked #1 for got worse.

Given these results, it is perhaps more useful to calculate the Net Change in Overall Opinion for each brand, which is calculated by using the following formula:

GB-GW/# of total respondents = Net Change in Brand Image

In other words, the percentage of respondents who said a brand “got worse” is subtracted from the percentage of respondents who said their opinion of a brand had “got better” (ignoring the “stayed the same” number).

This takes into account both the positive and negative perceptions of brands, along with how these opinions have changed over time.  It also presents a more balanced view of which brands are getting better and which are getting worse in the minds of market participants. 

Because some brands are polarizing (as seen in the example above), it’s possible that a strong “got better” response might be cancelled out by a strong “got worse” response.  As a result some companies who were rated in the top 30 on just the “got better” score were not included in the global or regional top 30 because their high “got worse” score dragged down their overall result.  At the same time, a few of the companies with high “got worse” scores still made the top 30 list because these negative scores were cancelled out by even higher “got better” scores. 

In order to arrive at the Net Change in Overall Opinion, research participants were asked whether their opinion of various brands had “got better”, “got worse” or “stayed the same” over the past 2-3 years.

The results of this enquiry are shown below in two ways:

  • An overall industry “league table” that shows the 30 highest ranked vendors for the metric “Net Change of Overall Opinion.”  The data in this chart is broken out globally and regionally. 

 

  • An analysis of the “frequency” of appearance in the “Net Change of Overall Opinion” league table.”

 

The top 30 ranked brands for Net Change of Overall Opinion are shown below for both the global sample of all respondents as well as for all respondents in each of the geographic regions.  

 

 In all cases, these results are shown in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked by respondents to the survey.      

 

Question: Has your opinion of the following brands improved or declined over the past 2 years in relation to the broadcast technology products / services they provide?

Interestingly, a total of 65 broadcast technology vendor brands are included in this table, demonstrating the strong variation in opinion change based on geographic segmentation of respondents.

In terms of frequency of appearance in this table:

  • 3 brands appear four times, meaning they were ranked in the top 30 globally and in each geographic region. It is possible
  • 10 brands appear three times
  • 26 brands appear two times
  • 26 brands appear once, which demonstrates that some brands are strongest in one geographic area

 

Analysis of the data shows that are some clear market leaders on a global basis, while others are strong on a regional basis. 

A breakdown of how many times each company appears in the ranking shows how many times each brand appears in the chart above.

.

Brands appearing four times:

  • Barco, IBM, Ikegami

 

Brands appearing three times:

  • Avid, Chyron, For-A, JBL, JVC, Mackie, Motorola, Siemens, Telex, Yamaha

 

Brands appearing two times:

  • AKG, Audio-Technica, Axon, Dayang, Dolby, Echolab, Electro Voice, EMC, EVS, Fujitsu, Grass Valley, Harmonic, Harris, Klein + Hummel, Orad, Pesa, Pharos, Quantel, RTS Intercom Systems, SeaChange, Shure, Snell, Solid State Logic, Sundance, Tandberg / Ericsson, Tektronix

 

Brands appearing once:

  • Accenture, AMS-Neve, beyerdynamic, Dalet, Evertz, Focal, HP, KRK Systems, Leader Instrument, Marshall Electronics, Miranda, Net Insight, Neumann, Omneon, Omnibus, Pilat, Pixel Power, Quantum, Rohde & Schwarz, Ross Video, S4M, Screen Service, Sintecmedia, Utah Scientific, Vizrt, Wheatstone

 

.

Analysis of overall opinion by region:

The table below shows the global and regional performance for each brand in the top 30 ranking of overall opinion. 

.

The frequency chart shows some interesting geographic variation in the data, which is highlighted below.

 

Only Global

Interestingly a the following 13 appear in the top 30 Net Change in Overall Opinion for the global sample, but not in any of the regions. 

  • Accenture, AMS-Neve, Focal, KRK Systems, Leader, Net Insight, Omnibus, Pilat Media, Pixel Power, Quantum, Sintecmedia Utah Scientific, Wheatstone

There a number of possible explanations for this.  For example these companies may have fared well in each of the regions, but not well enough to make the top 30.  However when all responses are aggregated, there positive data propels these brands to the top 30 on a global basis.  It is also possible that these brands scored well on a regional basis, but that the regional sample was insufficient to be included in the regional rankings.

 

All regions, but not global

Interestingly, for four brands the converse of the above also occurred – i.e. these brands made the top 30 list for Net Change of Overall Opinion in each of the three regions, but not in the global sample.

  • Avid, For-A, JBL, Yamaha

Again this is due to a variety of factors including the aggregate strength of certain brands, coupled with sample sizes.

 

Global + one region

Nine brands managed to achieve a top 30 ranking in the global Net Change in Overall Opinion league table, despite being in the top 30 of only one of the three geographic regions.

  • Dayang, Echolab, Electrovoice, Fujitsu, JVC, Motorola, Pesa, Quantel, Sundance

 

 

 

Regional Variation

The following brands did not make the top 30 in the global league table of overall opinion, but they did appear in the top 30 overall opinion ranking in one of the geographic regions:

 

Only EMEA

Beyerdynamic, Dalet, Neumann, S4M,

 

Only Asia

Evertz, HP, Miranda, Omneon, Rohde & Schwarz, Ross Video, Screen Service

 

Only Americas

Marshall Eelctronics, Vizrt

.

Please keep in mind when reviewing this information that all data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, not in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2010 BBS.  Also, the charts in this posting measure the responses of all 2010 BBS respondents, regardless of their company type, company size, geographic location, job title and budget for broadcast technology products.  

In order to get full value from this data, it is necessary to evaluate these results on a granular basis.  If you would like more information, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

This article is based on the findings from the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of industry trends, technology purchasing behavior and the opinion of vendor brands.  With more than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participating, the 2010 version of the BBS is the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.