Posts Tagged ‘Broadcast Graphics & Branding’

2015 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) Reports Now Available

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 04 2015

The 2015 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) Reports have now been published and are available from Devoncroft Partners.

We have been publishing the BBS Reports since 2009.  Each new edition is created through several months of research, including interviews with technology end-users, global surveys of technology decision makers, analysis of the end-user responses, and visualization of the data collected.  Now in its seventh year of publication, the BBS remains the most comprehensive annual study of technology end-users in the global broadcast and media technology industry.  Nearly 10,000 technology professionals in 100+ countries participated in the 2015 BBS, making it once again the largest market study of the media technology industry.

Based on feedback from technology vendors, media companies, and investors, we have updated the vendors, product categories, and market trends profiled in the 2015 BBS to better align with recent market developments.

These updates help ensure the BBS reports remains a critical reference for industry executives to improve strategic decision-making, customer engagement, marketing strategy, product planning, and sales execution.  In addition to technology vendor and service provider strategic planning, BBS reports are also used frequently for M&A and investment activities by both buyers and sellers.

Three types of 2015 BBS reports are available:

  • 2015 BBS Global Brand Reports: provides deep insight into how each more than 100 broadcast technology suppliers (see full list below) are perceived by market participants, along with comprehensive benchmarking of broadcast technology vendors on a wide variety of metrics

 

  • 2015 BBS Product Reports: provide detailed information from buyers, specifiers, and users of broadcast technology products in 30 separate categories (see full list below)

 

  • 2015 BBS Global Market Report: provides detailed information about industry trends, major projects being planned, products being evaluated for purchase, current and future plant infrastructure, broadcast technology budgets, and planned deployment of new technologies including 4K, HEVC compression, and IP-based technology infrastructure

 

For additional information on the 2015 BBS report, please email us.

As is Devoncroft’s custom, we will publish selected highlights from this year’s BBS reports on the Devoncroft website.  These articles are posted on a semi-regular basis, so please check back often.

To receive posts when published, please enter register with your email in the box in the upper right-hand corner of the page.

The tables below list the  technology vendor brands and product categories covered in the 2015 BBS.

 

All Brands Covered in 2015 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS)


Product Categories Covered in the 2015 Big Broadcast Survey

Technology Products & Vendor Brands Covered in the 2015 BBS, by Application Area

 

Acquisition & Production:

Camera Lenses

Angenieux, Canon, Fujinon

 

ENG Cameras

Canon, Hitachi, Ikegami, JVC, Panasonic, Sony

 

Large Format Single Sensor Cameras

ARRI, Blackmagic Design, Canon, Red Digital Cinema, Sony

 

Production Switchers

Blackmagic Design, Broadcast Pix, For-A, Grass Valley, NewTek, Panasonic, Ross Video, Snell, Sony

 

Studio/System Cameras

Grass Valley, Hitachi, Ikegami, JVC, Panasonic, Sony

 

 

Post Production:

 

Graphics & Branding

Adobe, Autodesk, Avid, ChyronHego, Evertz, Grass Valley, Imagine Communications, Orad, Pixel Power, Ross Video, Vizrt

 

Transcoding / Streaming

Dalet/AmberFin, Elemental Technologies, Envivio, Harmonic, Imagine Communications, Telestream

 

Video Editing

Adobe, Apple, Avid, EVS, Grass Valley, Imagine Communications, Sony

 

Infrastructure:

Bonded Cellular

Dejero, LiveU, Teradek, TVU, Vislink

 

Routing Switchers

Blackmagic Design, Evertz, Grass Valley, Imagine Communications, Nevion, Pesa, Ross Video, Snell, Utah Scientific

 

Signal Processing / Interfacing / Modular

Aja Video, Axon, Blackmagic Design, Evertz, For-A, Grass Valley, Imagine Communication, Ross Video, Snell

 

Video Transport

Arris, Aspera, Cisco, Ericsson, Evertz, Harmonic, Imagine Communications, Media Links, Net Insight, Nevion, Riedel, Signiant

 

 

Audio:

Audio Consoles

Avid, Calrec, Lawo, Salzbrenner Stagetec, Solid State Logic (SSL), Soundcraft, Studer, Wheatstone, Yamaha

 

Audio Processing & Monitoring

Adobe, Avid, Dolby, Linear Acoustic, RTW, TSL, Wohler

 

Intercom / Talkback

Clear-Com, Riedel, RTS Intercom Systems, Trilogy

 

Microphones

AKG, Audio-Technica, beyerdynamic, Electro Voice, Marshall Electronics, Neumann, Schoeps, Sennheiser, Shure, Sony

 

Monitors (speakers)

Adam, Avid, Focal, Genelec, JBL, KRK Systems, Mackie, Neumann, PMC,

 

 

Storage:

High Performance Shared Storage:

Avid, Harmonic, HP, IBM, Isilon Systems/EMC, NetApp, Quantum

 

Playout / Transmission Servers

Avid, EVS, Grass Valley, Harmonic, Imagine Communications, Ross Video

 

Production Servers

Avid, EVS, Grass Valley, Harmonic, Quantel

 

 

System Automation and Control:

Broadcast Business Management Systems

arvato/S4M, Imagine Communications, MediageniX, MSA Focus, SintecMedia/Pilat Media, VSN, Wide Orbit

 

Archive & Archive Management

ASG/Atempo, Masstech, Oracle/Front Porch Digital, Quantum, SGL, XenData

 

Playout Automation

Grass Valley, Imagine Communications, Pebble Beach, Playbox, Snell

 

Workflow / Asset Management

arvato/S4M, Avid, Dalet/Amberfin, EVS, Imagine Communications, Sony, Vizrt, VSN

 

 

Playout and Delivery:

Integrated Playout (Channel in a Box)

Evertz, Grass Valley, Harmonic, Imagine Communications, Pebble Beach, Playbox, Snell, Thomson Video Networks

 

On-line / Streaming Video Delivery Platforms

Brightcove, Kaltura, Ooyala, Piksel

 

Transmission Encoders

Arris, ATEME, Cisco, Elemental Technologies, Envivio, Ericsson, Harmonic, Imagine Communications, Thomson Video Networks

 

Transmitters

GatesAir, Hitachi, NEC, Plisch, Rohde & Schwarz, Screen Service, Toshiba

 

 

Test, Quality Control and Monitoring:

 

Multiviewers

Avitech, Axon, Evertz, For-A, Grass Valley, Imagine Communications

 

Test & Measurement

Imagine Communications, IneoQuest, Leader, Phabrix, Rohde & Schwarz, Tektronix

.

.

 

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2015. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

 

2014 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) Reports Now Available

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, market research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Jul 15 2014

After months of data collection, analysis, and visualization, we have now completed work on the 2014 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS). Reports from this study have now been published and are available from Devoncroft Partners.

If you’re not familiar with the BBS, it’s the most comprehensive annual study of technology end-users in the global broadcast industry. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries participated in the 2014 BBS, making it once again the largest market study of the broadcast industry.

BBS reports have been designed to help readers improve their strategic decision-making, customer engagement, marketing strategy, product planning, and sales execution.  BBS reports are also used frequently for M&A-related activities by both buyers and sellers.

.

Three types of 2014 BBS reports are available:

  • 2014 BBS Global Brand Reports:  provides deep insight into how each more than 100 broadcast technology suppliers (see full list below) are perceived by market participants, along with comprehensive benchmarking of broadcast technology vendors on a wide variety of metrics.

 

  • 2014 BBS Product Reports:  provide detailed information from buyers, specifiers, and users of broadcast technology products in 31 separate categories (see full list below)

 

  • 2014 BBS Global Market Report: provides detailed information about industry trends, major projects being planned, products being evaluated for purchase, current and future plant infrastructure, broadcast technology CapEx budgets, and planned deployment of new technologies including 4K, Connected TV, and Social TV.

.

 

If you would like information about these reports and how they can help your business, please get in touch.

 

In addition to these paid-for reports, we will also be publishing highlights from the 2014 BBS on the Devoncroft website.  These articles will be posted on a semi-regular basis, so please check back often.

To receive posts when they are published, just enter your email in the box in the upper right-hand corner of the page.

 

The tables below show the product categories and broadcast technology vendor brands covered in the 2014 BBS.

 

 Product Categories Covered in the 2014 BBS:

2014 BBS -- Product Categories Covered in the 2014 Big Broadcast Survey

 

 

Broadcast Technology Brands Covered in the 2014 BBS:

 

2014 BBS -- All Brands included in 2014 BBS

.

.© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2014. All Rights Reserved.

.

 

.

 

 

ChyronHego CEO to Step Down at End of 2013

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 04 2013

Michael Wellesley-Wesley, who has served as CEO of Chyron (now ChyronHego) for the past 10 years, will retire at the end of 2013, when his current employment agreement expires.  He will remain on the company’s board of directors.

Wellesley-Wesley will be replaced as CEO by current ChyronHego president Johan Apel, who was the chairman and CEO of Hego AB prior to Chyron’s merger with Hego earlier this year.

“The recent completion of the combination of Chyron and Hego unites two pioneering companies to create a global leader in broadcast graphics creation, playout and real-time data visualization,” said Wellesley-Wesley. “This is a truly transformative leap forward, and it presents an appropriate opportunity to define an orderly succession whereby the leadership responsibilities for the combined company transfer to Johan Apel. Johan is superbly well qualified to develop and execute the vision, the strategies and operating concepts for ChyronHego in ways that will allow us to simultaneously address the evolving needs of customers and the expectations of our shareholders.”

According to his most recent employment contract, Wellesley-Wesley receives a base salary of $482,850 per year, as well as incentive bonus.

Wellesley-Wesley is also eligible for bonus payments under Chyron’s 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan, which is triggered if the company achieves certain GAAP revenue and budgeted non-GAAP cash flow targets. According to this plan Wellesley-Wesley is eligible to receive up to 70% of his base salary, or $337,995, if both targets are met at the 100% level.  If these targets are exceeded, by 25% or more the payout will increase by an additional 50 percent.

In August 2013, the company disclosed that during the first half of fiscal 2013, excluding the results of operations for Hego, which was acquired on May 22, 2013, Chyron achieved 106% of the target first half of 2013 GAAP-basis revenues objective and achieved 366% of the target first half of 2013 non-GAAP cash flow objective.  As a result, Wellesley-Wesley “earned an incentive compensation award of $221,231, of which the company remitted payroll withholding taxes on his behalf of $91,191 and paid him the balance of $130,040 in company common stock, based on the August 6, 2013 closing market price of $1.59 per share, resulting in the issuance of 81,786 shares.”

At that same time, Chyron terminated the 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan, and published a new management incentive compensation plan for the second half of 2013.  This was done to include new executive officers and management and align the interests of all members of management, including certain members of management that became executive officers of the Company upon the consummation of the business combination with Hego during the second quarter of 2013.

The targets for the new plan are also based on “budgeted GAAP-basis revenues for the second half of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, and budgeted Non-GAAP cash flows from operating activities for the second half of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013.

If both targets are achieved, Wellesley-Wesley is eligible for 70% of his base salary, or $168,998 (at 100% achievement of both performance conditions).

Chyron reported a net loss of $2.1m in the second quarter of 2013 on revenue of $10.7m, up 39% versus the same period a year ago, and up 34% versus the previous quarter.

The company’s net loss and operating loss in the second quarter of 2013 were both impacted by transaction costs associated with Chyron’s merger with Hego AB. The company says that when one-time costs,  including Hego merger-related expenses, restructuring costs and a valuation adjustment for contingent consideration related to the Hego merger in second quarter results, it posted net income of $800,000, and an operating profit of $900,000.

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Press Release: ChyronHego CEO Michael Wellesley-Wesley to Retire Effective December 31, 2013; Board Selects Johan Apel as Successor

Michael Wellesley-Wesley Employment Agreement with Chyron Corporation

Chyron Corporation: 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan

ChyronHego Corporation Second Half of 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan

ChyronHego Avoids NASDAQ Delisting as Shareholder Equity Rises After Merger

Hego Merger Drives 39 Percent Revenue Increase for Chyron in Q2 2013

Chyron – Hego Stock Purchase Agreement

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Chyron to Acquire Hego Group in All-Stock Deal

Michael Wellesley-Wesley Change in Control Agreement – May 23 2013

Michael Wellesley-Wesley Change in Control Agreement – November 19, 2012

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved.

.

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 5 — the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 22 2013

This is the ninth in a series of articles about some of the findings from Devoncroft’s 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. 

 . 

This is the fifth post in a series of articles about how broadcast technology vendors were ranked and benchmarked on a variety of metrics by the respondents to the 2013 BBS.

Previous articles in this series described the 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, the 2013 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table, the 2013 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table, and the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table.

This article follows on from the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table, by focusing on one of the most important metrics for any technology company – Quality.

 

2013 Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality Rankings

The broadcast prides itself on the fidelity of its sound and images, the perception of quality is a very important metric for broadcast technology vendors.

Many vendors use quality as one of the key components of their market positioning.  Likewise, many end-users include technical performance and quality as a part of their procurement strategies.

The table below shows the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table, which shows the top 30 ranked brands for “Quality” by 2013 BBS respondents.

An explanation of how these results were calculated can be found at the end of this article.

.
Please note that both audio and video brands are included in these rankings, and that the table below shown brands in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked in the study. 

.

 

2013 BBS -- Quality League Table

.

This list contains a broad mix of vendors including large and small firms; single product and multi-product firms; global and regional players; and audio and video technology providers.

Given the diversity of the vendors in this list, it’s worth asking whether factors such as organization size, breadth of product range, geography, or technology impact the perception of quality.

Since the ultimate manifestation of quality is in the actual product delivered to end-users, it’s useful to understand what products are produced by the vendors on this list, and whether this has an impact on the perception of quality.

 

2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Quality Rankings by Frequency of Product Category

The table below shows the products produced by the vendors in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table, according the 2013 BBS segmentation.

.

2013 BBS -- Quality Rankings -- Frequency of Product Categories

 

.

Out of the thirty product categories in the 2013 BBS, a total of twenty are produced by the vendors in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table.

Product categories included in the 2013 BBS, that are NOT listed in this table include:

Broadcast Business Management Systems, Communication Links, Ingest / Transcoding / Streaming, Library & Storage Management, Near-line / Off-line, and Archival Storage, Playout / Transmission Servers, Production Servers, Workflow / Asset Management

 

The top three products in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table are audio products – Microphones, Audio Mixing Consoles, and Speakers.

This is an interesting data point. Although there are 30 product categories included in the 2013 BBS, only five are directly related to audio.  Yet, the top three product categories in the 2013 BBS Quality rankings are audio products. Why are audio brands so prevalent in these rankings?

One possibility is that for many people, audio is all about the quality and fidelity of the sound.  Thus quality is the ultimate metric for audio brands. Indeed, our research consistently shows that many pure-play audio companies have extremely high quality ratings.

Another thing to consider is that (as mentioned above in bold), the rankings posted on this website always contain both audio and video brands. Since there are fewer audio brands in the study, there may be a higher concentration of responses per brand on a relative basis when an audio professional responds to the survey.

Another issue is that the top 3 ranked product categories Microphones, Audio Mixing Consoles, and Speakers – are typically found in high-profile environments, and particularly in real-time or live environments where there are not always second chances to re-do a show, event, or recording.

Interestingly, the same can be said for many of the video-oriented products in the above chart.

Video products including cameras, production switchers, and video editing are typically found in live production or mission-critical studio applications. And the primary function of many test & measurement products, which are also produced by three of the brands in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table, is to measure quality and fidelity.

Many of these products tend to be high ticket items that are produced by the industry’s larger vendors. This begs the question of whether organization size plays a role in the perception of quality.  Larger companies often have a broader product offering, but does this translate into a higher perception of quality?

The table below examines the correlation between size of vendor / product range and the market’s perception of quality, by showing the number of product categories (as defined by the 2013 BBS segmentation) offered by each brand listed in this ranking.

.

2013 BBS -- Quality Rankings -- Frequency of Brands

.

Sure enough, the vendors at the top of this chart are larger vendors that provide multiple product lines.

Having said that, the majority of the vendors in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table are single product category companies (as defined by the 2013 BBS segmentation).

This shows that specialist vendors, whether large or small, who have expertise in a particular areas of technology are often able stand out from the rest of the market, including vendors who may be much larger.

 

Year-Over-Year Changes to the BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table

Twenty-four of vendors in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table were also listed in this ranking last year.

 

The following six companies are new entrants to the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table.  They are listed in this ranking in 2013, but they were not listed in 2012.

Blackmagic Design, Cisco, Leader Instruments, Riedel, RTS Intercom Systems, Yamaha

 

The following six brands were listed in the 2012 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Quality League Table, but are not listed in the 2013 rankings:

Clear-Com, Dolby, Isilon Systems/EMC, Mackie, Panasonic, Wheatstone

.

 

How These Results Were Calculated

Based on how they answered a series of screening questions in the 2013 BBS were answered, relevant brands were algorithmically determined for each research participant. Each 2013 BBS participant was then asked to rank a variety of relevant broadcast technology vendor brands for “Quality” on a scale of 1-10 — with 10 being best in the market, and 1 being worst in the market.

Global response data from all BBS respondents was then aggregated and averaged in order to generate a global “Quality Score” for each brand based on these responses.

The brands with the top 30 scores for quality were then included in this ranking table. These brands were then sorted by alphabetical order to create the tables shown in this article.

The product table in this article was created by cross-referencing the top 30 ranking brands for global Quality Scores in the 2013 BBS with the product categories these brands produce, according to the 2013 BBS product segmentation.  The complete list of brands and product categories included in the 2013 BBS can be found here.

 

When reviewing this information, please note the following:

The inclusion of any brand in the tables in this article is dependent on available sample size.  The minimum sample size for inclusion in the tables shown herein is 30 respondents per cut of the data. Therefore it is possible that a highly regarded brand may have been excluded from any or all of the tables in this article due to insufficient sample size.

Both audio and video brands are included in the calculation of the rankings in this article, whereas these brands are typically separated in actual BBS reports. The inclusion of both audio and video brands may have a significant impact on the vendor brands included in these rankings.

All data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, NOT in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2013 BBS.

 

.

The information in this article is based on select findings from the 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. The BBS is published annually by Devoncroft Partners.

Unless otherwise specified, all data in this article measures the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2013 BBS, regardless of factors such as organization type, organization size, job title, purchasing and geographic location.  Please be aware that responses of individual organization types or geographic locations may be very different. Granular analysis of these results is available as part of various paid-for reports based on the 2013 BBS data set. For more information about this report, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

.

.

Related Content:

The 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) – overview of available reports, including covered brands and product categories

Largest Ever Study of Broadcast Market Reveals Most Important Industry Trends for 2013

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013

Analyzing Where Money is Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Broadcast Technology Products Being Evaluated for Purchase in 2013 – 2014

Devoncroft Partners: 2013 Broadcast Industry Market Research Findings

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 1 – The 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 2 – The 2013 BBS Net Change of Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 3 — The 2013 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 4 – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table.

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved. Findings May Not Be Reproduced or Quoted Without Written Permission from Devoncroft Partners.

.

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 4 — the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 19 2013

This is the eighth in a series of articles about some of the findings from Devoncroft’s 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. 

 .

This is the fourth post in a series of articles about how broadcast technology vendors were ranked and benchmarked on a variety of metrics by the respondents to the 2013 BBS.

The first three posts in this series described the 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, the 2013 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table, and the 2013 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table.

.

This post looks at one of the most important metrics for any technology company – innovation.

An explanation of how these results were calculated can be found at the end of this article.

The product side of the film & broadcast industry is driven by technology and innovation.  All vendors spend heavily on research and development in order to create advanced technologies that make their products stand out from the competition.  Thus innovation is a very important component of the brand image and reputation of vendors in this space.

 

Please note that both audio and video brands are included in these rankings, and that the table below shown brands in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked in the study. 

 

2013 BBS -- Innovation League Table

 

There are a wide variety of companies on this list, including large and small firms; single product and multi-product firms; global and regional players; and audio and video technology providers.

Let’s look specifically at the how these companies and their products were ranked in the 2013 BBS, beginning with products and technology.

As shown in the chart below, these companies make products in 22 of the 30 product categories that we covered in the 2013 BBS.

.

 

2013 BBS -- Innovation Rankings -- Frequency of Product Categories

 

 

The top offerings provided by brands in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table are production switchers, pro audio products, and test and measurement.

Does company size play a role in innovation?  Larger companies offer more products and are consequently used in more places than their smaller counterparts.  But this does not necessarily translate into innovation.

The chart below breaks down the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table by the number of product categories (as defined by the 2013 BBS segmentation) offered by each brand listed in this ranking.

 

2013 BBS -- Innovation Rankings -- Frequency of Brands.

.

What’s interesting about these rankings is that it includes the largest brands in the industry such as Cisco, Sony and Panasonic, alongside smaller (and relatively new) companies such as Elemental Technologies and Phabrix.

It’s also interesting to note that just under one-third of the companies listed in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table, are pure-play audio vendors.

There are also quite a few software companies including Adobe, Autodesk, Elemental, Telestream, and Vizrt.

Another thing to note is that this ranking is once again dominated by companies that provide products in a single product category – 19 out of 30 brands in this list (up from 18 in 2012). This suggests that focused companies who apply their efforts to specialist product areas are often able to generate more innovation in the eyes of the market.

At the same time, larger companies are also represented on this list of the broadcast industry’s top innovators. Sony and Snell provide products in the most categories in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table, followed by Adobe, Blackmagic, and Panasonic.

Of course, companies are listed here based on how many 2013 BBS product categories they produce, which is not an absolute measure of the products offered be each vendor on this list. There are some very large companies on the list above who appear in just one 2013 BBS category.

.

Year-Over-Year Changes to BBS Innovation Rankings

The majority of vendors in the 2013 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table were also listed in this ranking last year.

 

The following new entrants to the BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table are listed in 2013 but were not listed last year:

Elemental Technologies, Leader, Telestream, Yamaha

 

The following brands were listed in the 2012 BBS Broadcast Technology Vendor Innovation League Table, but are not listed this year:

Angenieux, Mackie, Omneon, Salzbrenner Stagetec, T-VIPS

.

 

How These Results Were Calculated

2013 BBS participants were asked to provide their perception of the innovation of a variety of relevant broadcast technology vendor brands on a scale of 1-10 — with 10 being best in the market, and 1 being worst in the market.

This data was then aggregated and averaged in order to generate the global score for each brand based on these responses.

The top 30 global brands for innovation were then sorted by alphabetical order to create the tables shown in this article.

 

When reviewing this information, please note the following:

The inclusion of any brand in the tables in this article is dependent on available sample size.  The minimum sample size for inclusion in the tables shown herein is 30 respondents per cut of the data. Therefore it is possible that a highly regarded brand may have been excluded from any or all of the tables in this article due to insufficient sample size.

Both audio and video brands are included herein, whereas these brands are typically separated in actual BBS reports.

All data these charts are presented in alphabetical order, NOT in the order brands were ranked by respondents to the 2013 BBS.

 

.

The information in this article is based on select findings from the 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. The BBS is published annually by Devoncroft Partners.

Unless otherwise specified, all data in this article measures the responses of all non-vendor participants in the 2013 BBS, regardless of factors such as organization type, organization size, job title, purchasing and geographic location.  Please be aware that responses of individual organization types or geographic locations may be very different. Granular analysis of these results is available as part of various paid-for reports based on the 2013 BBS data set. For more information about this report, please contact Devoncroft Partners.

 

 

.

.

Related Content:

The 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) – overview of available reports, including covered brands and product categories

Largest Ever Study of Broadcast Market Reveals Most Important Industry Trends for 2013

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013

Analyzing Where Money is Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Broadcast Technology Products Being Evaluated for Purchase in 2013 – 2014

Devoncroft Partners: 2013 Broadcast Industry Market Research Findings

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 1 – The 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 2 – The 2013 BBS Net Change of Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 3 — The 2013 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

Previous Year: The 2012 BBS Innovation Leaders League Table

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved.

Findings May Not Be Reproduced or Quoted Without Written Permission from Devoncroft Partners.

.

.

ChyronHego Avoids NASDAQ Delisting as Shareholder Equity Rises After Merger

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A, Quarterly Results, SEC Filings | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 13 2013

ChyronHego, said in a regulatory filing that the company believes that it has regained compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A), which requires companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Market to maintain a minimum of $10,000,000 in stockholders’ equity.

On August 9, 2013, Chyron received a letter from NASDAQ stating that the Exchange has determined Chyron now complies with the continued listing requirement for shareholders’ equity, subject to the Chyron providing evidence of its compliance upon filing its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

This notification formally puts to rest an issue that Chyron has been dealing with for the past six months.

In March 2013, Chyron received notice of potential delisting from NASDAQ because its stockholder’s equity has fallen below the minimum $10m threshold set by rules of the Exchange.

At that time, Chyron explained that its stockholder’s equity fell below the $10m threshold at the end of 2012 because it took a $19.5m accounting charge against deferred tax assets. Because this allowance reduced the company’s shareholders’ equity by $19.5m, Chyron company ended the year 2012 with shareholders’ equity of about $1.9m, which put it in violation of NASDAQ’s listing requirement.

In accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rules, Chyron had 45 calendar days from the date of the notice to submit to NASDAQ a plan to regain compliance with its listing requirement.

In April 2013 Chyron submitted to NASDAQ its plan to regain compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement. NASDAQ granted Chyron an extension to regain compliance with the stockholders’ equity requirement until August 15, 2013, by which date the company will be required to file its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

A key factor in Chyron’s plan to regain compliance was the company’s then-proposed merger with Hego, which has now been successfully completed.

Under the terms of the Chyron – Hego Stock Purchase Agreement Chyron paid $1,000 in cash and issued 12,199,431 shares of its common stock to the former Hego stockholders in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Hego. The issuance of the 12,199,431 shares, at a value of $1.36 per share at the closing of the transaction, resulted in an increase in the Company’s shareholders’ equity of approximately $16.6m.

The company says that as a result of the Hego merger, and following the release of Chyron’s Q2 2013 results, its shareholders’ equity was approximately $17.9m June 30, 2013, comfortable above the minimum threshold set by NASDAQ.

Following the announcement of its Q2 2013 earnings, Chyron filed an 8-K with regulators that disclosing that it has received a letter NASDAQ  stating that once the company files its Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2013, it will officially be compliant with all NASDAQ listing requirements.

In the same filing, Chyron published its management incentive compensation plan for the second half of 2013.  The company says that it terminated its previous 2013 incentive plan and adopted a new plan that include new executive officers and management and aligns the interests of all members of management, including certain members of management that became executive officers of the Company upon the consummation of the business combination with Hego during the second quarter of 2013.

On Chyron’s Q2 2013 earnings call, company CEO Michael Wellesley-Wesley briefly discussed the delisting, saying “As instructed by NASDAQ, we notified the SEC directly and, thus, the NASDAQ indirectly this morning via a current report on Form 8-K that was filed at the SEC before market opened of our compliance with NASDAQ’s minimum shareholders equity requirement and we now consider the matter closed.”

Wellesley-Wesley has long assured shareholders that the company would do whatever it takes to avoid delisting.

On the company’s Q1 2013 earnings call in May 2013 he said: “The bottom line is this – these shares are not going to be delisted. There are all kinds of ways that we can get back in compliance. We’ll make sure that we don’t get delisted.”

With this latest filing, it looks as though Wellesley-Wesley has made good on his promise to ChyronHego shareholders.

.

.

Related Content:

Chyron 8-K Filing: Notice of Renewed Compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A)

Chyron 8-K Filing: Company believes it has regained compliance with NASDAQ’s shareholders’ equity requirement

ChyronHego Corporation: Second Half of 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan

Hego Merger Drives 39 Percent Revenue Increase for Chyron in Q2 2013

Chyron Q2 2013 Earnings Call Transcript

Chyron Revenue Up 2 Percent in Q1 2013, Gives Update on Merger, Layoffs, and Potential NASDAQ Delisting

Chyron Lays Off 20 Employees, Says it will Save $3 Million per Year

Chyron Receives Another Delisting Notice From NASDAQ

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Chyron to Acquire Hego Group in All-Stock Deal

Chyron – Hego Stock Purchase Agreement

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved.

.

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 3 — The 2013 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor Brand Research, market research, Top Broadcast Vendor Brands | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 12 2013

This is the seventh in a series of articles about some of the findings from Devoncroft’s 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of broadcast industry trends, technology purchasing plans, and benchmarking of broadcast technology vendor brands. Nearly 10,000 broadcast professionals in 100+ countries took part in the 2013 BBS, making it the largest and most comprehensive market study ever conducted in the broadcast industry. 

 .

This is the third post in a series of articles about how broadcast technology vendors were ranked and benchmarked on a variety of metrics by the respondents to the 2013 BBS.

The first two posts in this series described the 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table, and the 2013 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table.

These rankings show how the global sample of 2013 BBS respondents rated a variety of broadcast technology vendor brands in terms of their overall opinion of these vendors, and also how their opinions have changed over time.

A large number of brands were listed in the two previous ranking lists. Between these two sets of league tables, a total of 70 broadcast technology vendor brands were listed (out of a total of 151 brands included in the 2013 BBS (the complete list of brands included in the 2013 BBS can be found here).

There were 46 vendors in the in the 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table (versus 48 in 2012), and 53 vendors in the 2013 BBS Net Change in Overall Brand Opinion League Table (versus 58 in 2012).

However, the brands in the Overall Opinion and Net Change of Opinion rankings were not always the same.  In fact, out of the 70 broadcast technology vendor brands that were listed in the previous two rankings, just 29 brands were listed in both sets of rankings, either globally or regionally.

We’ve called this list of the 29 brands listed in both the 2013 BBS Overall Opinion and Net Change of Opinion rankings the 2013 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table. 

These vendors, shown below, are held in high regard today by broadcast technology buyers, and are also perceived to be getting better over time.

Please note that both audio and video brands are included in these rankings, and that the table below shown brands in alphabetical order, NOT in the order in which they were ranked in the study. 

.

2013 BBS -- Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

 

 

There are a wide variety of companies on this list, including large and small firms; single product and multi-product firms; global and regional players; and audio and video technology providers.

What they have in common is strong brand recognition, and a dynamism that 2013 BBS respondents feel is making them even stronger.

 

Year-over-year changes to these rankings:

Twenty-two in the 2013 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table were listed in the 2012 version of these rankings:

Adobe, Aja Video, Autodesk, Avid, Blackmagic Design, Canon, Cisco, Dolby, Evertz, EVS, Lawo, Neumann, Panasonic, Riedel, Rohde & Schwarz, RTW, Sennheiser, Shure, Snell, Sony, Tektronix, Yamaha

.

The following seven companies in the 2013 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table were not included in this ranking in in 2012

Adam, Angenieux, Fujinon, Solid State Logic, Soundcraft, Studer,  Wheatstone

.

The following eight companies that were listed in the 2012 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table are not included in the 2013 ranking:

Apple, Clear-Com, Genelec, Harmonic, Harris, Omneon, Schoeps, Wohler

 .

Brand Opinion Leaders by Product Categories

As shown in the chart below, the companies in the 2013 BBS Brand Opinion Leaders League Table make products in 23 of the 30 categories that we covered in the 2013 BBS, down from 25 product categories in 2012.

The top products for brand leaders are Audio Mixing Cosoles, Microphones, Audio Processing  and Monitoring, Graphics & Branding, Production Switchers, Signal Processing / Interfacing / Modular, and Video Editing.

 .

 

2013 BBS -- Brand Opinion Leaders -- Frequency Analysis of Product Categories

.

The chart above has a good mix of audio and video products, as well as a mix of hardware and software products.

However, it is interesting to note that many of the most frequently cited product categories are audio-related.  Some vendors on this list, such as Adobe, Avid, Riedel, and Sony, are listed in both audio and video product categories in the 2013 BBS.  Other vendors are listed in only audio categories.  These include Adam, Dolby, Lawo, Neumann, RTW, Sennheiser, Shure, Solid State Logic, Soundcraft, Studer, Wheatstone, and Yamaha.

It is also useful to look at the number of product categories provided by each vendor in the Global Brand Opinion Leader League Table.  After all, larger companies often make more products and are consequently used in more places than their smaller counterparts.

The table below shows the number of product categories that each brand in this ranking produces (as defined by the segmentation used in the 2013 BBS).

 

2013 BBS -- Brand Opinion Leaders -- Frequency Analysis

 

 

 .

While there are several brands on this list that appear in many product categories, the vast majority produce only one or two types of products.  Indeed out of the thirty brands in this table, sixteen brands  appear only once.

Keep in mind that companies who produce only one type of product are not necessarily small.  There are some very large companies on the list above who appear in just one 201 BBS category.

It turns out that to fully understand what drives brand opinion and brand leadership, one needs to look at the factors that drive and influence these perceptions.  This includes the company’s reputation for things like innovation, reliability, quality, value and great customer service.

These metrics will be covered in future posts.

.

.

Related Content:

The 2013 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS) – overview of available reports, including covered brands and product categories

Largest Ever Study of Broadcast Market Reveals Most Important Industry Trends for 2013

Tracking the Evolution of Broadcast Industry Trends 2012 – 2013

Analyzing Where Money is Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry – The 2013 BBS Broadcast Industry Global Project Index

Broadcast Technology Products Being Evaluated for Purchase in 2013 – 2014

Devoncroft Partners: 2013 Broadcast Industry Market Research Findings

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 1 – The 2013 BBS Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Ranking Broadcast Technology Vendors Part 2 – The 2013 BBS Net Change of Overall Brand Opinion League Table

Previous Year: The 2012 BBS Global Brand Opinion Leaders League Table

.

© Devoncroft Partners 2009 – 2013. All Rights Reserved.

.

.

.

Hego Merger Drives 39 Percent Revenue Increase for Chyron in Q2 2013

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Quarterly Results | Posted by Joe Zaller
Aug 12 2013

Broadcast graphics specialist Chyron reported that its revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was $10.7m, up 39% versus the same period a year ago, and up 34% versus the previous quarter.

These results include revenue from Hego, which was acquired by Chyron, from May 22, 2013 through June 30, 2013.

Excluding the $2.3m contribution from the sales of Hego products and services, the company’s revenue was up $700,000 or 9 percent, versus the same period a year ago.

The net loss for the quarter was $2.1m, or $0.09 per share, compared to a net loss of $630,000 or $0.04 per share last year, and a net loss of $921,000, or $0.05 last quarter (Chyron issued new share as part of the Hego merger process).

The operating loss for the second quarter of 2013 was $1.9m, compared to an operating loss of $1.1m for the same period last year, and an operating loss of $810,000 last quarter.

The company’s net loss and operating loss were both impacted by transaction costs associated with Chyron’s merger with Hego AB. The company says that when one-time costs,  including Hego merger-related expenses, restructuring costs and a valuation adjustment for contingent consideration related to the Hego merger in second quarter results, it posted net income of $800,000, and an operating profit of $900,000.

Service revenue in the second quarter of 2013 was $3.97m in the quarter, or 37% or total revenue.  Product revenue in the quarter was $6.74m.

Because the company did not break out the percentage of product versus service revenue from Hego, it is difficult to do a direct comparison with previous periods.

In the first quarter of 2013, the company’s revenue was split 75%/25% in favor of product sales.

Gross margins for the quarter were 68.4%, down from 69.2% last year, and down from 71% last quarter.

Operating expenses for the second quarter of 2013 were $9.2m. up 44% versus the same period a year ago, and up  41% versus the previous quarter.

R&D costs in the quarter were $2.3m, up 21% versus the same quarter last year, primarily due to the inclusion of $400,000 in Hego R&D expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses were $3.3m, down 6% versus the second quarter 2012, primarily due to inclusion of $200,000 of Hego costs, and $20,000 in expense from amortization of intangibles from the Hego merger, offset by a $600,000 decrease in Chyron &M expenses.

G&A expenses in the quarter were $3.6m, an increase 260% versus last year.  The company attributed the big jump in G&A coasts to inclusion of $300,000 in Hego G&A expenses and a $2.3m increase in Chyron G&A expenses, including $1.6m of merger-related expenses, severance costs of $600,000, and equity-based compensation of $400,000.

The company ended the quarter with $2.19m in cash, down from $2.3m last quarter.

“The second quarter was a pivotal quarter in the formation of ChyronHego,” said ChyronHego CEO Michael Wellesley-Wesley. “Having effected an extensive rebranding, we presented the combined company to our customers at the NAB tradeshow in April and received a very encouraging response. In early May, 2013, we eliminated a number of Chyron positions primarily in the United States, thus completing a restructuring initiative that began in 2012, and on May 22, 2013, we formally completed our merger with Hego AB to form ChyronHego. We’ve now been conducting business as a brand new company for just over two months. We have won significant new business in terms of product sales with BT Sport and ITV Regional News in the UK and major US and LatAm networks, as well as with US TV Station Groups. In the area of multi-year sports production services contracts, Hego announced its largest ever contract with the German Soccer League, during the quarter. I am optimistic regarding our business prospects for the second half of 2013.

“The strategic thinking underpinning the creation of ChyronHego is to create a market leading company in the fields of TV Graphics, Data Visualization and Production Services for ‘Live’ TV and Online News and Sports production. This merger creates a strong, global graphics company that is committed to innovation and to evolving existing products and services to support our customers in the future. Our second quarter financial results were inevitably impacted by one-time cash and non-cash expenses associated with the transaction. We anticipate that the compelling financial logic for the transaction will become clearer as we progress through the second half of 2013 and into 2014.”

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: ChyronHego Reports Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2013

Previous Quarter: Chyron Revenue Up 2 Percent in Q1 2013, Gives Update on Merger, Layoffs, and Potential NASDAQ Delisting

Previous Year: Chyron Revenue Declines 18 Percent in Q2 2012

Chyron Lays Off 20 Employees, Says it will Save $3 Million per Year

Chyron Receives Another Delisting Notice From NASDAQ

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Chyron to Acquire Hego Group in All-Stock Deal

Chyron – Hego Stock Purchase Agreement

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Chyron Revenue Up 2 Percent in Q1 2013, Gives Update on Merger, Layoffs, and Potential NASDAQ Delisting

Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A, Quarterly Results, SEC Filings | Posted by Joe Zaller
May 10 2013

Broadcast graphics specialist Chyron reported that its revenue for the first quarter of 2013 was $8.01m, up 2% versus the same period a year ago, and up 8% versus the previous quarter.

The net loss for the quarter was $921,000, or $0.05 per share, compared to a net loss of $951,000, or $0.06 per share last year, and a net loss of $20m, or $1.17 per share, last quarter, when the company took a $19.5m valuation allowance against the company’s deferred tax assets (see below for implications).

The operating loss for the first quarter of 2013 was $810,000, compared to an operating loss of $1.074m last year, and an operating loss of $570,000 last quarter.

The company’s net loss and operating loss were both impacted by transaction costs associated with Chyron’s pending merger with Hego AB, which was announced in March 2013. Excluding Hego transaction costs, net loss would have been $220,000, and the operating loss would have been $110,000.

The company’s service revenue, which includes the sales of its AXIS cloud-based graphics service, maintenance agreements, training and creative services was $2.04m in the quarter, or 25% or total revenue. This is a decrease of 2% versus the same period a year ago, and a decrease of 7% versus the previous quarter.  The company the lower service revenue to lower revenues from training and other professional services offset by increased sales of software and hardware maintenance contracts for broadcast graphics products.

Product revenue in the quarter was $5.97m (75% of total revenue), an increase of 3% versus Q1 2012, and an increase of 15% versus last quarter.  The company said it experienced a slight increase in product revenue as a result of an improvement in market share in Asia and a major program upgrade in our European market. However, sales fell in North America, due to price competition and weak demand. Sales in Latin America also declined during the quarter.

Gross margins for the quarter were 71%, up from 70% last year, and up from 69.1% last quarter.

Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2013 were $6.53, up 1% compared to last year, and up 15% versus the previous quarter. Excluding Hego transaction costs, operating expenses would have been $5.84m, or 12% lower than the same period a year ago.

Last quarter, Chyron combined its reporting of sales and G&A expenses.  This quarter it did not break out its expenses at all, making it difficult to determine the full impact of the cost-cutting exercise that the company embarked upon several quarters ago.  However, the company did say that its expenses in both research and development and sales and marketing, were essentially flat with the previous year when Hego transaction costs are excluded.

The company ended the quarter with $2.3m in cash, versus $2.4m last quarter.

 

Update on Latest Round of Staff Layoffs

Prior to the release of its Q1 2013 earnings, Chyron disclosed that it has cut the size of its workforce by 20 employees as part of a reorganization plan designed to “reduce operating expenses while maintaining its focus on strategic initiatives.”

The company says that it will take a charge of approximately $950,000 in Q2 2013 to cover the cost of the staff reduction, and that these actions will result in savings of approximately $3m on an annualized basis, beginning in the third quarter of 2013.

Chyron has reduced the size of its employee base by more than 30% since the end of Q1 2012.  At that time, the company had 126 employees.  There were 107 employees at the end of Q1 2013; and there are now 86 employees following the latest round of staff cuts.

Chyron CEO Michael Wellesley-Wesley told investors that the layoffs came after “eight weeks of very, very rigorous studying and discussion as to where these changes should be made,” and that the cuts were made “across the board.”

According to Wellesley-Wesley, the only departments not impacted by the layoffs were the company’s customer service department and customer-facing product specialists. Sales, engineering, internal administration, and “quite a layer of mid and senior management figures were affected,” he said.

The company will gain an additional 90 – 100 full-time employees following the completion of its pending merger with Hego AB.

 

Update on Potential Nasdaq Delisting:

In March 2013, Chyron received a letter from The NASDAQ Stock Market notifying the company that it is no longer in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global Market because its stockholder’s equity has fallen below the minimum $10m threshold set by NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(A).

If it does not regain compliance with the Rule, Chyron’s shares could be delisted from Nasdaq.

On the company’s earnings call, Wellesley-Wesley said that the company’s stockholders equity fell below this level at the end of the previous quarter as the result of the company taking a $19.5m valuation allowance against the company’s deferred tax assets (described above).

Wellesley-Wesley said that because this allowance reduced the company’s shareholders’ equity by $19.5m, the company ended the year 2012 with shareholders’ equity of about $1.9m, which put it in violation of Nasdaq’s listing requirement.

Wellesley-Wesley said the company has filed a plan of compliance with Nasdaq, and that a primary element of this plan is the company’s proposed merger with Hego, which the company believes will bring with it enough shareholders’ equity to bring the company’s total about $10m.

However, Wellesley-Wesley cautioned that regaining compliance with Rule 5450(b)(1)(A) was not a certainty because of additional one-time charges will be recorded in the second quarter of 2013.  These include a charge of approximately $950,000 for the headcount reduction that the company enacted at the beginning of May 2013,  and a second charge of approximately $1.3m due to the early vesting of equity awards upon the closing of  the Hego transaction.

Nevertheless, Wellesley-Wesley assured shareholders: “The bottom line is this – these shares are not going to be delisted. There are all kinds of ways that we can get back in compliance. We’ll make sure that we don’t get delisted.”

.

.

Related Content:

Press Release: Chyron Reports Financial Results for the First Quarter 2013

Previous Quarter: Chyron Posts Another Loss in Q4 2012 as Revenue Continues to Decline

Previous Year: Revenue and Losses Up at Chyron in Q1 2012

Chyron Lays Off 20 Employees, Says it will Save $3 Million per Year

Chyron Receives Another Delisting Notice From NASDAQ

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Chyron to Acquire Hego Group in All-Stock Deal

Chyron – Hego Stock Purchase Agreement

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

Chyron Lays Off 20 Employees, Says it will Save $3 Million per Year

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
May 08 2013

Broadcast Graphics specialist Chyron Corporation said it has cut the size of its workforce by 20 employees as part of a reorganization plan designed to “reduce operating expenses while maintaining its focus on strategic initiatives.”

The company estimates that it will save approximately $3m on an annualized basis as the result of the layoffs, beginning in the third quarter of 2013.

All terminated employees will receive severance pay and benefits, as well as an adjustment in the terms of their stock option and/or restricted stock unit (“RSU”) equity awards outstanding on their termination date. The affected employees’ RSU awards will be modified to state that they will vest on June 24, 2013 if the impacted employee signs a separation agreement from the company.

The company says that expenses for severance, benefits and changes in equity awards will be approximately $950,000, with severance benefits accounting for about $600,000, and costs relating to the changes in the equity awards making up the remainder.

These charges will be recorded as an expense in Q2 2013.

These new staff cuts continues the trend that stated in Q3 2013, when Chyron appeared to shift from its previous strategy of increasing engineering, sales, and marketing expenses in anticipation of increased revenue from both new products and cyclical spending from broadcasters gearing up for the 2012 Olympics and presidential elections.

In anticipation  of a strong 2012 Chyron increased its spending across the board, and by the first quarter of 2012 the company’s operating expenses had jumped 20% versus the previous year, including 31% y/y increase in sales and marketing costs, and a 19% y/y increase in R&D spending.

However, when the anticipated new revenues had not materialized by the third quarter of 2012, Chyron CEO Michael Wellesley-Wesley told investors on the company’s Q3 2012 earnings call: “I can assure you that we’ve taken and will continue to take the appropriate steps to align our operating expenses with the current business climate.”  At that time, Wellesley-Wesley said the company had scaled back investments in product development and that the company would also be reducing headcount.  On the company’s Q3 2012 earnings call Wellesley-Wesley told analysts “about 60% of our costs are related directly to people and so it’s difficult to make meaningful reductions in expense — operating expenses — without addressing that fact. The steps we’ve taken will certainly reduce OpEx by 5% or more going forward and you will begin to see the real impact of that take effect in Q1 next year.”

With the announcement of the latest round of layoffs, Chyron is now saying that the impact of these additional cuts will begin to materialize in Q3 2013.

For the full year 2012, Chyron had revenue of $30.2m, down 4% versus 2011, and recorded a net loss of $22.3m, or $1.31 per share. $19.5m of the company’s net loss was valuation allowance against the company’s deferred tax assets.

.

Related Content:

Chyron 8K Filing: Discloses Staff Reduction

More Broadcast Vendor M&A: Chyron to Acquire Hego Group in All-Stock Deal

Chyron Posts Another Loss in Q4 2012 as Revenue Continues to Decline

Chyron Cuts Expenses as Revenue Declines 3 Percent in Q3 2012

Chyron Q3 2012 Earnings Call Transcript

 

.

© Devoncroft Partners. All Rights Reserved.

.

%d bloggers like this: