Archive for September, 2010

More Broadcast M&A: DG FastChannel Buys Match Point Media, Expands into Infomercial Market

broadcast technology market research, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 30 2010

Advertising and HD content delivery specialist DG FastChannel announced today that it will acquire privately-held Match Point Media LLC for $26 million in cash. The transaction will close on October 1, 2010.

Match Point is comprised of two wholly-owned companies, Treehouse Media Services, and Voltage Video.  It provides solutions and services to ad agencies and advertisers in the direct response advertising industry. The company had revenues of approximately $14m, and EBITDA of approximately $3m during the first nine months of 2010. DG FastChannel said that it expects to realize about $2m in cost synergies by the end of 2011. 

The company said that the acquisition of Match Point will enable DG FastChannel to add services and additional capacity for both short form and long form content preparation services, including: tagging and customization, voiceover, watermarking and closed captioning.

It appears that by buying Match Point, DG FastChannel wants to do for the $5Bn infomercial market what it did for the broadcast advertising market – i.e. bring it into the digital distribution era.  Company Chairman and CEO Scott Ginsburg said  “We expect that infomercials will switch from a predominantly Standard Definition (SD) format to the more complex HD format over the next several years, and we believe the Company is now positioned to lead this transition.” 

.                                                                                               

You can read the full DG Fastchannel press release announcing the deal here.

.

Media General Launches Mobile DTV Service in Columbus, OH

broadcast industry trends, content delivery | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 29 2010

US broadcast station group Media General announced today that WCMH, its Columbus Ohio NBC affiliate, is the company’s first station to launch a mobile DTV service.

Company president and CEO Marshall Morton said that mobile DTV will enable the company to extend its reach and deliver content to viewers, when, where and how they want it.  Morton also said that the company is looking forward to “launching Mobile DTV in as many as 5-7 additional television markets in the coming months.”

WCMH is apparently starting with a simulcast of its primary channel, but according to a press release it “expects to provide unique graphics for the mobile stream and allow for spot advertising insertions much like cable systems do today.”

.

You can read the full Media General announcement here.

.

.

A Look at How the Recession Affected Broadcast Technology Vendors

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 29 2010

Last week I wrote an article about how the recession impacted the technology budgets of broadcasters and other purchasers of broadcast technology products.

This showed that broadcast technology spending in EMEA held up better than in the Americas, which was hit particularly hard by the recession.  For example, 40% of respondents from the Americas reported that their budgets for 2010 were lower than in the previous year.  

So how did this reduction in spending affect the sales of vendors who supply hardware and software products to these customers?

To find out, we asked just under 800 broadcast technology vendors who participated in the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey how their company’s revenues had changed over the past year in terms of percentage growth or decline.

On an overall basis, 45% of vendors reported that their sales had either declined or stayed the same versus the previous year, and about half of respondents reported that their sales had increased – in some cases by quite a bit.

When I saw these results I wanted to know the detail behind them so that I could figure out if one type of vendor had fared better than others, and if so what were the determining factors.

For example: was company size a factor? How about location, type of products sold, or whether the vendor is a “pure-play” broadcast company or a one that operates in multiple markets including broadcast?

Based on these questions, I decided to break out the results by a variety of demographic factors, as shown in the chart below:

.

When the results are viewed this way it appears that the largest companies were the most impacted by the recession. 53% of respondents from vendors with 1,000+ employees reported that their sales had either declined or stayed the same. 

Large companies were closely followed by respondents based in the Americas, and those from firms that primarily supply hardware products.  More than half of these respondents reported that their sales had either declined or stayed the same versus the previous year.

In terms of pure-play versus non-pure-play broadcast vendors, respondents from firms that sell more than 80%+ of their products into the broadcast industry fared slightly worse than those who sell 20% or less of their products into the industry.

So which vendors reported the most growth?  The short answer is small companies, software vendors and VC funded private firms (many of whom are undoubtedly small providers of software products).  

In terms of overall growth 50% of vendors reported that their revenues had increased versus the previous year. However when you consider companies who provide primarily software products, this number jumps to 62% of respondents.

What about the respondents who said their company’s revenues increased the most? Again, software companies lead the way.  21% of respondents from vendors that sell primarily software products, and 18% of privately held VC-backed companies, reported that their revenue grew by more than 30% versus the previous year. And 18% of small companies (those with 50 employees or less) also reported that their revenues had increased by 30% or more.

When reading these results it’s of course important to keep in mind that revenue growth is one thing, but profitability is another. 

This analysis does not consider the profitability of vendors, but I recently wrote about the findings of a recent IABM study in this area as part of a post on my impressions of IBC 2010.

In that post I reported that during an IBC session on the state of the industry, IABM Director General Peter White stated that about 60% of broadcast technology suppliers are now making a profit – up considerably from last year – with European companies performing better in terms of profit performance.   For more information on these results, I encourage you to contact the IABM.

If you’re interested in more information about how broadcast technology vendors responded to the 2010 Big Broadcast survey, please contact me and I’ll try to give you the information you need.

.

.

This article is based on the findings from the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS), a global study of industry trends, technology purchasing behavior and the opinion of vendor brands.  With more than 5,600 people in 120+ countries participating, the 2010 version of the BBS is the largest and most comprehensive market study ever done in the broadcast industry.

.

.

 

ITV Also Sells its Screenvision Stake to Shamrock Fund

broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 29 2010

The other day I wrote an article about Technicolor selling the majority of its 50% stake in cinema advertising firm Screenvision to the Shamrock Capital Growth Fund II, a media-focused PE fund.

It turns out that ITV plc, the owner of the other half of Screenvision has also sold its share to the Shamrock fund.

According to the press release, ITV will sell the entirety of its 50% stake to Shamrock while Technicolor, will retain a minority shareholding and will continue to be Screenvision’s provider of film and digital services, with the film processing and distribution agreement extending through end of life.

Additionally, as part of the transaction, Screenvision has entered into an amended exhibitor agreement with Carmike Cinemas, one of the largest motion picture exhibitors in the U.S.  Carmike will also become a minority shareholder in Screenvision as part of its exclusive agreement with Screenvision.

You can read the full press release about the transaction here.

Having Found a Buyer For Grass Valley, Technicolor Now Sells Majority of its Stake in Screenvision

broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 27 2010

As part of its previously published strategy of refocusing its efforts on content creators and network service providers, Technicolor announced today that it has sold the majority of its ownership stake in cinema advertising company Screenvision US for $60m in cash.

The buyer is the Shamrock Capital Growth Fund II, a private equity fund focused on media, entertainment and communications.

Technicolor, which called the sale “another important milestone in our disposal program,” says it will apply the proceeds of the transaction towards repayment of its Disposal Proceeds Notes (DPN), which totaled €260m as of the company’s last earnings release.  Technicolor’s “disposal program” includes the previously announced deal whereby Francisco Partners has agreed to acquire Grass Valley.

Under the terms of the deal, Technicolor will receive $60m in cash in exchange for a portion of its 50% ownership in Screenvision, which was previously a joint-venture between UK broadcaster ITV plc and Technicolor. 

Technicolor will retain an 18.8% interest in a newly-formed Screenvision holding company, along with one seat on the new company’s board of directors.

Interestingly, Technicolor will continue to provide services to Screenvision.  According to Technicolor CEO Frederic Rose, “We will keep a minority stake in Screenvision due to our close business relationship and will continue to be Screenvision’s provider of both film and digital services.”  According to the company’s press release, the film processing & distribution agreement extends through end of life.

The transaction is pending regulatory approval and customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the fourth quarter 2010.

.

You can read the full Technicolor announcement of the sale here.

.

More Broadcast M&A: KIT Digital Buys MAM Provider Brickbox Digital Media

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials, Broadcast Vendor M&A | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 24 2010

IPTV asset management technology supplier Kit Digital announced today that it has acquired privately-held Brickbox Digital Media for $10.1m in cash and stock. 

In addition to the upfront purchase price, the deal also includes an earn-out provision whereby Kit Digital will pay Brickbox shareholders 10% of forward revenues from Brickbox over a four-year period, subject to a $20 million annual revenue threshold for each year and certain profitability thresholds.

This is the third acquisition Kit Digital has made this month.  Just before the IBC show, the company announced that it had purchased both UK-based systems integrator Megahertz from Canadian parent Azcar, and Accela Communications, a provider of software and services aimed at the production, delivery and measurement of interactive IP-based video content.

Based in the Czech Republic, Brickbox provides asset management solutions that act as an intermediary between content owners and distributors, offering products and services that include mezzanine file management, localization, digital cinema mastering, and authoring of media for replication.

Brickbox which has  approximately 85 employees in its main Prague and Sofia offices as well as additional staff in the U.S., UK, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, earned a profit of $1m on $12m of revenue over the past 12 months. The company’s clients include 20th Century Fox Entertainment, Warner Home Video, Universal Studios, and numerous European content distributors.

Kit Digital chairman and CEO Kaleil Isaza Tuzman  said that Brickbox was “a choice acquisition for us which we had our eyes on for some time, extending our capabilities and commercial reach in premium content management and services for the major and ‘mini-major’ Hollywood studios.”

.

You can read Kit Digital’s full press release about the purchase of Brickbox here.

You can read the full press release about Kit Digital’s purchase of Accela and Megahertz here.

.

Wegener Reports Preliminary Results for Q4 and Full 2010 Fiscal Year

broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 23 2010

Wegener today announced preliminary operating results for its Q4 and full year 2010.

For the 4th quarter, the company lost of approximately $(336,000) on revenue of approximately $2.6m.  During the same period a year ago, the company lost $(538,000) on revenue of $2.9m.  Order intake (bookings) for the quarter was up slightly to approximately $1.4m versus $1.3m a year ago.

For the full year, the company lost approximately $(2.3)m on revenue of approximately $9.0m, compared to a net loss of $2.6m on revenues of $12.7m in fiscal 2009. Order intake (bookings) for the year was $8.4m, a 53% increase over the order intake in 2009.

The company also reported that its 18-month backlog was approximately $6.0m as of September 3, 2010, compared to $4.3m on August 28, 2009, and that its total multi-year backlog at September 3, 2010, was approximately $6.1m compared to $6.8m at August 28, 2009.

Company President and CEO Troy Woodbury said that while the company’s bookings and revenue performance in the fourth quarter fell short because of delayed orders, he remains optimistic.  “While I am pleased with the increase in bookings there is significant room for improvement,” he said. Our fourth quarter revenue was the highest of the quarters in fiscal 2010. We came very close to achieving our goal of breakeven revenue and would have, had several orders not been delayed.”

You can read the full Wegener preliminary results press release here.

Brief Impressions of IBC 2010

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 22 2010

Last week I attended the 2010 IBC show in Amsterdam.  The product introductions and events at the show have been well covered elsewhere, so this is just a short note on my impressions of the show.

After spending the better part of a week in Amsterdam, and having 40-50 meetings with vendors, bankers, broadcasters and others, I came away from the show with three general impressions – the market is improving, there is more realism about 3D, and the drive toward file-based operations continues. 

It’s also worth noting that I think that these trends will probably act as a catalyst for further market consolidation as vendors seek to position themselves for the post-recession world.

.

Improving Market Conditions

In terms of market improvement, many people I spoke with said that buyers were coming back and that once-delayed projects are now table. Many vendors reported that their sales and profitability have increased markedly versus a year ago.  Interestingly, there do seem to be geographic and technological differences in the market recovery.  For example, many people reported that activity in Asia, northern Europe and the middle east was strong; while southern Europe and parts of north America were still sluggish for some.  Also some types of products seem to have recovered more strongly – automation being a good case-in-point.

To get a better handle on the industry’s current status, I attended a very interesting “state of the industry” session hosted by the IABM (the international organization that represents technology suppliers), which was held on the opening day of IBC.  During the session, IABM director general Peter White presented the results of a recent survey of broadcast buyers and suppliers.  This was followed by a panel discussion that included representatives from Sony, Harris, Axon and Softel, with industry veteran Adrian Scott leading the session.

According to White, about 60% of broadcast technology suppliers are now making a profit – up considerably from last year – with European companies performing better in terms of profit performance. 

White also reported that confidence has returned to buyers, with more than half of those surveyed feeling “very or quite optimistic” about the future; and 39% reporting that they feel that the recession is over or that they are coming out of it.

However, White also indicated that things will be different for vendors in a post-recession world.  According to the IABM’s study, broadcast technology buyers are changing the way they purchase, and are also expecting more from vendors in terms of value, interoperability, support etc.

My understanding is that the IABM will be making their findings available in the near future, although I am not sure what for this will take.  It’s good information that everyone should read.

.

More Realism About 3D

While 3D was a major theme of the IBC show, my feeling was that, in contrast to the CES and NAB shows earlier in the year, the hype about 3D seems to have dissipated as vendors have become more realistic about 3D’s ability to drive revenue and profitability growth.

In multiple press conferences and vendor meetings, the 3D hype was much toned down.  For example, at the Grass Valley press conference SVP Jeff Rosica referred to 3D as a niche market.  At the Harris press event, Broadcast Communications president Harris Morris referred to 3D projects as experiments.

I am on the record as a 3D skeptic, at least as far as the short term potential for broadcasters, so I was not surprised to hear this type of comments.  I should also point out that these comments are consistent with our market research findings about the most important trends in the broadcast industry, where 3D placed far down on the list versus the transition to HDTV, the move to file-based workflows and multi-platform content delivery. 

There is of course a small part of the market where 3D is and will continue to be a major growth driver.  However, it looks like the bulk of the market is now taking a more realistic approach and focusing on what customers really need.

For more on this subject, have a look at Mike Grotticelli’s article in Broadcast Engineering called 3-D Technology Finds Few Enthusiasts at IBC2010.

.

IT and File-Based Technologies

It may seem obvious that IT and file-based technologies are continuing to make inroads into the broadcast market, but at IBC I was struck by the accelerating pace of change in this area.

Vendors, both large and small continue to innovate in this area in an effort to help broadcasters streamline their operations and do more with less.

The shift to IT technology is having an interesting impact on the industry, in the form of product development, M&A and outside investment.

On the product development front, some vendors have jumped into the file-based world with full force – e.g. Evertz who launched a full blown playout server and storage solution at IBC.

Others have sought to accelerate their move into the IT world through acquisition – e.g. Miranda’s purchase of OmniBus, which gives the traditional hardware supplier a highly developed IT-based playout and automation solution.  Another recent industry M&A deal between Telestream and Anystream helped Telestream consolidate its position in the encoding / transcoding / streaming space.  I would not be surprised to see more M&A in this area as traditional vendors seek to beef up their file-based expertise.

The move to IT has also helped bring new money into the industry.  For example two transcoding vendors, Elemental Technologies  and AmberFin both recently announced that they have closed funding rounds, which will help them expand their presence in the broadcast marketplace.

Economists Say Recession is Over – What was it Like for the Broadcast Industry?

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research, Broadcast technology vendor financials | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 21 2010

This week, the Wall Street Journal reported that the National Bureau of Economic Research, the arbiter of the start and end dates of a recession, determined that the US recession that began in December 2007 ended in June 2009.  

I am not sure these dates match up with the reality in the broadcast industry, since 2008 was a  banner year for most of the industry with the US elections and the Beijing Olympics.  Still, there’s no doubt that the industry has been in recession for some time, and we are now being told that it’s over — officially at least.

Whether you believe that the recession is over or not, there’s no denying that times have been tough in the broadcast industry over the past couple of years.  

Broadcast technology budgets were hard hit by the global downturn, which in turn impacted the supplier community.  For the past 18 months, vendor after vendor has reported that their sales are down due to the reigning-in of spending by customers.  During this time technology providers have been impacted severely. Many have reported losses and have gone through painful rounds of layoffs.  Some businesses have liquidated, and there has been a marked uptick in industry consolidation.  

To find out how broadcast technology budgets were impacted by the recession, we asked a series of in-depth questions to a global sample of broadcast technology professionals as part of the 2010 Big Broadcast Survey (BBS).  (The BBS, which is conducted annually by Devoncroft Partners, is the largest and most comprehensive study of the broadcast industry. More than 5,600 people participated in the 2010 study).  

 .

Regional comparison of broadcast technology budgets in 2010 

 As seen in the chart below, broadcast technology spending in EMEA held up better than in the Americas, which was hit particularly hard by the recession.  40% of respondents from the Americas reported that their budgets for 2010 were lower than in the previous year.   

   

Significantly, Asian markets showed the most budget growth in 2010 with nearly 60% of respondents reporting that they planned to increase their spending on broadcast technology products in 2010. This data is consistent with a recent survey conducted by the IABM and presented last week during a “state of the industry” session at IBC.  

Overall the past year or so has been tough for the broadcast industry. In 2010, just 34% of respondents reported that their broadcast technology budgets had increased versus the previous year.  32% reported that their budgets had stayed about the same, and 28% reported that their budgets had decreased, including 8% of respondents who said that their spending had declined by more than 30%.  

However, the indications are that the outlook for 2011 is better.  The question everyone wants to know is: when spending returns, where will money be spent?  

Traditionally, in the broadcast industry, major projects drive technology budgets, which in turn drive product purchase.  To help readers better understand how major projects are impacting technology spending, I recently wrote an article called Where is Money Being Spent in the Broadcast Industry? — A Review of Major Projects Being Planned, which provides some insight into broadcast CapEx on a global basis.  

In it, I showed the major projects that are being planned and budgeted for by more than 3,000 broadcast processionals – including radio and TV broadcasters, cable/satellite/IPTV operators, playout centers, post production facilities, and cable programmers.   

Here’s the chart from that article:  

  

.

By a wide margin, more respondents selected “upgrading infrastructure for HD/ 3Gbps operations” than any other type of project.  In addition to upgrading infrastructure for HD/3Gbps operations, respondents also indicated that they plan to upgrade their transmission and distribution capabilities – presumably to support their transition to HDTV and to prepare for analog switch-off.  You can read the full post here.  

.

What Will Drive Post Recession Broadcast Technology Spending?  

One of the key issues that broadcast professionals must ask themselves in a post-recession world is whether broadcast technology spending will be the same as the pre-recession days, or has there been a more fundamental shift.  

My suspicion is that things have changed – for both buyers and suppliers of broadcast technology.   

Broadcast technology buyers today remain for the most part risk averse, and many have shifted their focus.  They are focused on increasing efficiencies, and finding new ways to monetize content through initiatives like multi-platform content distribution.  At the same time I keep hearing the mantra that products have to “fit for purpose” and “good enough for the job” rather than the best.  

On the supplier side, vendors have also shifted their focus.  For one thing, many vendors seem to want to shift to a more software-centric model as IT technology continues its seemingly unstoppable progress.  At the same time, there is an increased emphasis on technologies that enable increased efficiencies through file-based workflows (in order to meet the needs of buyers mentioned above). However, some of the firms with leading expertise in software and file-based technologies are not necessarily the companies that were considered industry leaders pre-recession.  This leads one to imagine two scenarios – new leaders will emerge, or M&A among technology vendors will increase as larger technology suppliers look to bring much needed expertise in-house.  In reality both will probably happen, which means that the next few years will be interesting to watch.  

 

AMWA and EBU Announce Roadmap for Interoperable Media Services

broadcast industry technology trends, broadcast industry trends, broadcast technology market research | Posted by Joe Zaller
Sep 20 2010

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and The Advanced Media Workflow Association (AMWA) announced today that the two organizations successfully held a round table session around SOA and the Framework for Interoperable Media Services (FIMS).  During these sessions users were invited to highlight the market needs for a FIMS solution.

During the round table FIMS announced the a 2-phase roadmap for developing specifications.

Phase 1 will consist of a common service definition format, after the high level architecture and framework described in the request for technology is first refined. This framework will cover all system and management requirements (service management, awareness and communication, content and time awareness, security, framework extension). The framework will be built upon IBM (SOA based Media Services Framework) and Sony (Media SOA Framework) proposals with the valued experience of service developers and users from Amberfin, BBC and Cinegy. The project will also address container issues seeking maximum compatibility with AAF and MXF.

Phase 2 will subsequently investigate the possibility of defining common services using the framework developed in phase 1. All respondents have already suggested key services.

AMWA’s Brad Gilmer said that the need for this work is obvious because “media companies are being asked to deliver more programs to more platforms while operating under a very restricted economic environment. They care about the FIMS work because it provides a standardized framework within which they can design and implement facilities which meet their needs now, but also allow them to more easily adapt to the future. File-based facilities are the way of the future, and FIMS is at its core.”

You can read the full EBU / AMWA press release here.